With the passage of MACRA in 2015, Congress combined and reformed existing physician payment incentives in Medicare to create the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System, or MIPS. MIPS’ goal was to encourage clinicians to deliver more efficient, higher-quality care, but many observers have raised concerns that MIPS will fail to achieve this objective, while also creating substantial administrative burdens.
On Friday, July 20th, the USC-Brookings Schaeffer Initiative for Health Policy hosted a conference to discuss whether MIPS is achieving the desired objectives and whether the program should be maintained, reformed, or even eliminated. Two expert panels convened. The first focused on experience with MIPS to date, and the second discussed whether the program should be reformed or replaced and, if so, how.
Panel 2: Should MIPS be reformed?
Agenda
-
July 20
-
Introduction
-
Panel 1: How is MIPS working?
DownloadsPanelist
Shari Erickson Vice President, Governmental Affairs and Medical Practice - American College of PhysiciansValinda Rutledge Vice President, Public Payor Health Strategy, Care Coordination Institute - Greenville Health SystemAaron Lyss Director of Strategy and Business Development - Tennessee Oncology -
Panel 2: Should MIPS be reformed?
Panelist
Matthew Fiedler Joseph A. Pechman Senior Fellow - Economic Studies, Center on Health Policy @mattafiedlerSarah Levin Professional Staff Member - House Committee on Ways and MeansRobert Horne Senior Director - Leavitt PartnersJim Mathews Executive Director - MedPAC
-