Deep Integration in Mega Trade Agreements: What Role for Japan and the United States?
For nearly two decades, the World Trade Organization (WTO) has struggled to update the rules for international trade and investment. As WTO negotiations have stalled, the agenda of deeper economic integration is being addressed through mega trade agreements, such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), and Japan-EU FTA. With many leading economies negotiating agreements that will impact a significant percentage of global trade, the stakes are high. Will the mega trade agreements succeed in the areas that have eluded the WTO? Will these agreements generate trade standards that can be accepted globally? Or will they produce fragmentation with the emergence of a Pacific standard and an Atlantic standard?
On December 16, the Center for East Asia Policy Studies hosted a public seminar examining the priorities in the rules area of trade negotiations for Japan, Europe, and the United States, with the aim of identifying shared agendas and strategies to bridge differences at the negotiation table. The speakers, experts and practitioners from the United States and Japan specifically addressed the TPP, TTIP, and the Japan-EU FTA and examine the broader strategic interests of drafting and disseminating high quality standards of economic integration and rule of law, and whether that can encourage further market reform and regulatory transparency in emerging economies such as China and India.
Join the conversation on Twitter at #MegaFTA.
Partner - Covington & Burling LLP
Professor of International Political Economy - Keio University, Japan
Consulting Fellow, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI)
Director of Global Economic Attitudes - Pew Research Center
To subscribe or manage your subscriptions to our top event topic lists, please visit our event topics page.
The French might have been presumptuous, or a bit too clever, in seeing Trump only as an opportunity. It comes with a cost. The cost being the division of Europe... [Trump's] clear favoritism [for nationalist-led countries like Poland, Hungary, and Italy can exacerbate divisions within Europe]... Macron wants to be a strong leader that Trump disagrees with but respects for being strong.