China’s economic rise and growing global participation make it a critical factor in U.S. strategic calculations. But public perception of China in the United States has soured in the face of Chinese actions at home and abroad that seem to challenge U.S. ideals and interests. Western media have chronicled a persistent tightening since at least 2008 of the space within China’s borders for policy debate, social activism, rights lawyering, academic discourse, and investigative reporting, which some analysts maintain has increased and become more institutionalized since Xi Jinping became general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in November 2012.
Yet, the CCP is simultaneously engaged in a long-term “reinventing government” project to modernize China’s governance tools and institutions to accommodate a rapidly changing society with a more market-oriented economy. Faced with widespread environmental degradation, food safety scandals, illegal land seizures, fraud and corruption, ethnic unrest, social protests, and a fundamental lack of trust within Chinese society and between the government and its people, the Chinese leadership has come to regard law as essential to addressing the complex issues and diverse interests it faces. It has vowed to build a more law-based, transparent, participatory, and accountable government, to enhance both its effectiveness and its legitimacy.
This paper introduces some of China’s less-reported governance reforms, particularly the development of government transparency and public participation in decisionmaking under the rubric of open government. This open government project often conflicts with the CCP’s strong impulse to control and maintain its preeminent position in China’s legal and political systems. Even so, facts on the ground demonstrate that fundamental changes are taking place in China’s legal and governance arena. New values of transparency and participation are gradually being implemented and appear to be taking root in China’s complex, dynamic reality.
Because many of China’s new governance institutions are adapted from American and Western practices, they provide a case study of how engagement with the country is helping to promote positive domestic developments. Policymakers, companies, and organizations in the United States can help support and foster these positive developments in China for their mutual benefit through continued government-to-government programs and unofficial exchanges that share both best practices and lessons learned.
The Biden administration has a pretty good idea of what it wants from Europe, which is to go along with their China policy. They are less clear about what they type of Europe they want. Ultimately, if Biden wants a Europe that competes with China he will have to change how the US thinks about the EU, strategic autonomy, burden sharing, and trade.