LIZ ELSE: How does your work differ from what other modellers have been trying to do for years?
JOSHUA M. EPSTEIN: We create artificial societies of individual “agents” who behave like simple but plausible humans. We can simulate large numbers of people who differ from each other in various ways – their rules of behaviour, information, genetics and ethnic identities – and who interact locally. We can look at how those local interactions generate macroscopic patterns in society. That’s why I call this “generative social science”. We are building agent-based societies that are much richer than was possible 20 years ago. Mathematical economics and game theory focus on static equilibrium, and typically posit highly rational individuals. We are interested in bounded rationality – more like Homo sapiens than Homo economicus – and in dynamics. Of course, our method raises as many questions as it answers.
Read the full interview [subscription required]
While generation capacity [of electric vehicles] at a national level may be present, many bottlenecks will be local, especially at the feeder or distribution transformer level...There are broader ecosystem issues that need further study, including grid-signalling (including time-of-day pricing for electricity), valuing pollution reduction, charging infrastructure and finances...More than half the retail cost of petrol is taxes, which would need to be covered via other means if we move to EVs. It is unlikely one can (or should) tax electricity at the same rate
India's toilet initiative, under which the government is trying to install 75 million public toilets by 2019, is not on its face a women's rights move, but it will increase women's access to sanitation materials.