Trade backlash and the World Trade Organization
Past Event
Adjusting to the expanding role of emerging economies and confronting a rising tide of populism in the Western world are just two of the challenges facing the liberal economic order established by the Bretton Woods institutions. In the trading regime, these challenges have been compounded by the failure of the Doha Round and the inability to significantly update multilateral rules in two decades. How will the World Trade Organization (WTO) navigate these troubled waters? Moving forward, the WTO will need to find ways to ameliorate the negotiation logjam in order to deliver fresh gains from liberalization and mitigate the trade growth slowdown, as well as address sources of stress in the dispute settlement mechanism. At the same time, it may need to combat a potential protectionist backlash if key members succumb to the temptation of economic nationalism.
On May 10, the Center for East Asia Policy Studies at Brookings hosted a panel of experts for a discussion on how the WTO will address some of the challenges it faces and the potential impact on the liberal trading order.
Agenda
Panelists
Mireya Solís
Director - Center for East Asia Policy Studies
Senior Fellow - Foreign Policy, Center for East Asia Policy Studies
Philip Knight Chair in Japan Studies
Christina Davis
Professor of Politics and International Affairs - Princeton University
Scott Kennedy
Deputy Director, Freeman Chair in China Studies
Director, Project on Chinese Business and Political Economy - Center for Strategic and International Studies
Yorizumi Watanabe
Professor of International Political Economy - Keio University, Japan
More Information
To subscribe or manage your subscriptions to our top event topic lists, please visit our event topics page.
More
[On the possibility of ongoing secret negotiations between the U.S. and North Korea] I am always wondering if my chain is being yanked. It could also mean Kim is trying to undermine Moon, who positions himself as a broker between the U.S. and North Korea. These two potential explanations are not mutually exclusive.
