France and Europe after the terrorist attacks
Ten months after the terrorist attacks against Charlie Hebdo and a Kosher supermarket, Paris has been hit savagely again, with 130 people dead and hundreds more injured. This time, the terrorists did not take aim at a satirical newspaper, but rather targeted France’s youth as they were unwinding at a concert, soccer match, restaurants, and bars. It has been decades since France encountered such devastating violence. Why is the country now a prime target of terrorism? How does the attack relate to French foreign policy in the Middle East? What are the consequences for politics and society on both sides of the Atlantic? How should the international community respond?
To discuss France, Europe, and the aftershocks of terrorism, the Center on the United States and Europe (CUSE) at Brookings convened a panel of experts on the eve of French President Hollande’s visit to Washington. Speakers were Philippe Le Corre and Kemal Kirişci of CUSE, Joseph Bahout of the Carnegie Endowment, and Laure Mandeville of Le Figaro. Brookings Fellow Jeremy Shapiro provided introductory remarks and moderated the discussion.
Director at the Issam Fares Institute for Public Policy and International Affairs - American University of Beirut
U.S. Bureau Chief - Le Figaro
To subscribe or manage your subscriptions to our top event topic lists, please visit our event topics page.
President López Obrador's extension of the term of Supreme Court chief Arturo Zaldívar is part of his strong effort to recentralize power in the Mexican presidency and hollow out the independence and power of other Mexican institutions. His other moves to bend the justice system to his will include a reform that lowered the salary of judges but did not improve the quality of prosecutors and his unwillingness to allow an independent selection of the attorney general, with López Obrador himself retaining the power of appointment. His latest move with the two-year extension of Zaldívar’s term is especially worrisome. Zaldívar is also the president of the powerful Federal Judiciary Council. The council appoints and dismisses judges, sets career advancement rules and disciplines judges. Zaldívar will be setting the council’s and, thus, the whole judiciary’s, agenda and priorities for two years. This allows López Obrador to influence how courts will rule in cases regarding the executive branch, what cases they take up and the legality of new policies. These moves are taking place when the effectiveness of the judiciary in Mexico remains limited and deeply concerning. The attorney general’s office has proven weak, unwilling to take up key cases such as against the suspects in the brazen attack on Mexico City’s security minister, Omar García Harfuch—an event that symbolized the impunity with which Mexican criminal groups operate. Mexico’s justice system showed itself equally meek and disappointing in inadequately investigating the alleged complicity of former Mexican Defense Minister Salvador Cienfuegos and dismissing the case, potentially the most significant case of corruption and criminal collusion charges against a high-ranking Mexican official in two decades. A decade and a half after Mexico initiated its justice system reforms, 95 percent of federal cases still go unpunished. President López Obrador has scored some points, but the already precariously weak rule of law in Mexico, and thus the Mexican people, will suffer.