The United States will face a number of strategic defense policy issues in the near future. Is large-scale counterinsurgency really outdated and what does that mean for the future of the Army? Can the United States stay out of the Syrian civil war indefinitely? How worried should we be about China’s rise, and will Air-Sea Battle continue to be the answer to modernization strategy vis-à-vis China and perhaps others? And what would be the likely outcome should the U.S. attack Iran’s nuclear program?
Additionally, uncertainties about the future of the defense budget remain. Is sequestration likely to return in 2016, or might further action soften the projected cuts? How likely is it that presidential electoral politics that year, combined with possible world events, might change things in either direction? How should we understand the various forces and dynamics within Congress on this subject?
On March 3, the Center for 21st Century Security and Intelligence at Brookings and the American Enterprise Institute will host a discussion on future issues in U.S. defense strategy and spending. Joining in the discussion will be Representative Mac Thornberry (R-Tex.) and Representative Rick Larsen (D-WA), both of whom are members of the House Armed Services Committee and are two of the leading voices on defense strategy and spending on Capitol Hill. Brookings Senior Fellow Michael O’Hanlon, director of research for Foreign Policy, and American Enterprise Institute Resident Fellow Mackenzie Eaglen will moderate the discussion.
After discussion on the podium, the Congressmen will take questions from the audience.
To subscribe or manage your subscriptions to our top event topic lists, please visit our event topics page.
Many will find [military leaders' promises to adhere to a policy of non-interference] difficult to believe because ultimately, the reason that Khan lost power in April is that he had fallen out with the military. The outlook for Pakistan is political instability until the next election, whenever it is held.