After a hard-fought presidential campaign, President Obama was reelected with a narrow margin in the popular vote but a sizeable win in the Electoral College. Nearly every swing state fell into his column, and it appears that Mitt Romney took back only two states (Indiana and North Carolina) that Obama had seized in 2008. Defying the predictions of a year ago, Democrats actually gained in the Senate, but they did not come close to regaining control of the House. So divided government continues for at least two more years.
Obama won with a massive outpouring of votes from the core of his coalition—young adults, minorities, unmarried women, and lower income families. Despite numerous indications to the contrary during the campaign, voters under 30 constituted a slightly higher percentage of the electorate than they did in 2008. So did Latinos, who went for Obama by an overwhelming margin of 71 to 24 percent. White voters represented 72 percent of the electorate, down from 74 percent in 2008. The demographic shift continues its inexorable grind.
In several respects, the winning Obama coalition was narrower than it was four years ago. The president’s share of the white vote was down from 43 to 39 percent. He was supported by 56 percent of moderates, down from 60 percent, and by 45 percent of Independents, down from 52 percent. While the party composition of the electorate was virtually unchanged, the liberal share rose from 22 to 25 percent, enabling Obama to overcome a drop in support among conservatives. And while the president’s share of the vote from households making $50 thousand or less held steady at 60 percent, his support among middle income households ($50 to 100 thousand) fell from 49 to 46 percent, and among households making more than $100 thousand, from 49 to 44 percent.
In his victory speech last night, Obama listed a number of important goals for his second term—restoring fiscal stability, reforming the tax code, enacting comprehensive immigration reform, and achieving energy security. It remains to be seen whether a divisive election in a divided America has laid the foundation for progress in these areas. Obama believes that despite these differences, we are still “One America.” However that may be, it will take the skills of a statesman to forge the agreements we will need to move the country forward.
"There are concerns that placing the [Israeli] embassy in Jerusalem would be a sign that the United States recognizes it as a part of Israel's sovereign territory, even though the position of the U.S. over the last 70 years or so is that Jerusalem is actually disputed territory, and that the status of it will have to be resolved through negotiations."
"I would be surprised if the State Department interpreted the Jerusalem Embassy Act as requiring it to break ground on a new embassy facility or take other such steps. The plain language of the statute only requires that the secretary of state determine and report to Congress that the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem has officially opened."
"While positions within the international community vary, most foreign states have—like the United States—declined to take a position on who has sovereignty over Jerusalem and instead favor either negotiations to resolve this issue or international administration."