To the Editor:
Re “Ranting at Reality on Iraq” (editorial, April 26):
Any political settlement in Iraq is now a long shot. To have any prospects for success, there must be a strong and neutral broker.
The United States is perceived as too self-interested to play this role. Hence the need for a high-profile United Nations negotiator like the former president of Finland, Martti Ahtisaari, or the United Nations envoy Lakhdar Brahimi, who brokered the deal for a transitional government in 2004.
For Congress, an effective role would be to call on the Bush administration to engage in a “diplomatic offensive” to get the United Nations to begin such a process. The benchmarks for progress would focus on whether such a process is taking hold, with the Iraqis engaging in good faith.
If there is real progress toward peace, that is reason to sustain a troop presence. If not, that should be the rationale for a radical redeployment to contain the conflict or withdraw. Contingency plans are desperately needed for both scenarios.
Carlos Pascual
Washington, April 30, 2007
The Brookings Institution is committed to quality, independence, and impact.
We are supported by a diverse array of funders. In line with our values and policies, each Brookings publication represents the sole views of its author(s).
Commentary
Op-edWays to Speed An Exit From Iraq
May 10, 2007