Over the weekend, Crimeans voted overwhelmingly to secede from Ukraine, and then today Russia’s parliament swiftly voted to annex the country, as President Obama declared some sanctions on key Russian and Ukrainian officials. Brookings experts continue to offer commentary and recommendations on the unfolding crisis in Ukraine and Crimea. See previous editions of this roundup here, here and here.
Vladimir Putin has violated a major post-Cold War rule in Europe—respect for territorial integrity. If the West does not make clear there are consequences, will there be other cases? — Steven Pifer, ABC News
Putin is prepared to keep on pushing. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if he moves into other points into eastern Ukraine. — Fiona Hill, Associated Press
Fiona Hill, director of the Center on the United States and Europe, has a three-part article on Russian President Vladimir Putin. Part one focuses on Putin’s political and international thought. Part two looks at his attitudes on foreign policy. Part three examines the messages Putin’s actions toward Ukraine are sending abroad. Hill notes at the outset that “To begin to understand Russian President Vladimir Putin’s approach to the current crisis in Ukraine, we have to start with an effort to understand the man himself.”
Vladimir Putin is a product of his environment—a man whose past experiences have informed his present outlook and world view. As Clifford Gaddy and I propose in our recent book, Mr. Putin: Operative in the Kremlin, Putin is best understood as a composite of six multiple identities that stem from those experiences––the Statist, History Man, Survivalist, Outsider, Free Marketeer, and Case Officer. We argue that it is the combination of all these identities that made Putin an effective behind-the-scenes operator in Russian politics and helped propel him into the Kremlin in 1999-2000. These same identities are now at play as Putin deals with Ukraine and with the West’s response.
Steven Pifer, director of the Arms Control and Non-Proliferation Initiative at Brookings and a former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, told Bloomberg TV:
I think it looks like Putin is moving, in fact, very quickly to annex Crimea which … is probably going to be seen as the most blatent land-grab in Europe since World War II. And what it’s going to do is limit options in negotiating some sort of a path that de-escalates the crisis and fairly quickly trigger additional American and European sanctions on Russia.
Listen to the full segment below:
Pifer also writes that “The best revenge against Moscow is to help the Ukrainian state succeed. That is, to put Ukraine on a firm path to a growing economy with stable democratic institutions.”
Hill, along with Brookings President Strobe Talbott and Senior Fellow Clifford Gaddy (her co-author on Mr. Putin), are quoted extensively in this Bloomberg News article about Putin’s motives and the role of history. International condemnations of Russia’s actions just reinforce Russian identity, according to Gaddy, who says that “It’s part of the myth—God, or history, testing Russia, subjecting it to tests and trials. In so many times in their history, in extreme circumstances, they managed to prevail.”
Tanvi Madan, director of the India Project, examines India’s reaction to the situation, writing that “With national elections around the corner and few direct Indian interests in Ukraine, attention and coverage have been quite limited.” However, as she points out, “Indian economic analysts … have been concerned about the negative impact on the stock market, the value of the rupee and energy prices. This reason is indeed partly why India would like to see the crisis resolved speedily and peacefully.”
Here is some of what Brookings scholars are saying on Twitter:
Putin’s speech, while breathtaking in its distortion of history and reality, makes it essential for Obama to respond from the bully pulpit.
— Strobe Talbott (@strobetalbott) March 18, 2014
VIDEO Putin´s speech ceremony of signature Crimea annexation http://t.co/7O8oK9A1AY
— Javier Solana (@javiersolana) March 18, 2014
In call with Putin, Indian PM Singh talks unity+territorial integrity of countries. No mention of Indian POV on referendum in readout
— Tanvi Madan (@tanvi_madan) March 18, 2014
Putin’s decisionfor #Russia to annex Crimea = most blatant land grab in Europe since WWII. Will trigger additional Western sanctions.
— Steven Pifer (@steven_pifer) March 18, 2014
.@BrookingsFP‘s Putinologist FionaHill on her subject’s “art of offensive defense” | Brookings Institution http://t.co/hvZr9RJxDj
— Strobe Talbott (@strobetalbott) March 18, 2014
Wasting no time, Putin signs treaty of accession with Crimea. So much for the Sword-of-Damocles option leaving more room for diplomacy.
— Strobe Talbott (@strobetalbott) March 18, 2014
“The Payback Man”: my take on Putin via @OutlookIndia http://t.co/32eN7G1Sq3
— Strobe Talbott (@strobetalbott) March 18, 2014
Turn in U.S.-Russia relations in 9 photos http://t.co/5bzjGf1fpR
— Vali Nasr (@vali_nasr) March 18, 2014
Still wondering whether there are plans afoot to have a G7 summit somewhere other than Russia instead of a G8 one.
— David Steven (@davidsteven) March 18, 2014
When Putin pulled this stunt with S. Ossetia & Abkhazia, they were recognized by Russia, Nicaragua, & Venezuela. Let’s see how Crimea does
— Strobe Talbott (@strobetalbott) March 17, 2014
Congress should penalize #Russia re Crimea but do so in smart way. Best way = help #Ukraine succeed. http://t.co/5LV1fJQLdo
— Steven Pifer (@steven_pifer) March 17, 2014
#Ukraine and #Europe become energy independent from #Russia? @TimBoersma4 says it’s unrealistic: http://t.co/2kvSbxzgcM #energysecurity
— Charles Ebinger (@CharlesEbinger) March 17, 2014
Commentary
Brookings Scholars on the Ukraine/Crimea Crisis, 3/18/14
March 18, 2014