Skip to main content
marijuana_medical001
Report

Marijuana Policy and Presidential Leadership: How to Avoid a Federal-State Train Wreck

Stuart S. Taylor

Stuart Taylor, Jr. examines how the federal government and the eighteen states (plus the District of Columbia) that have partially legalized medical or recreational marijuana or both since 1996 can be true to their respective laws, and can agree on how to enforce them wisely while avoiding federal-state clashes that would increase confusion and harm communities and consumers.

This paper seeks to persuade even people who think legalization is a bad idea that the best way to serve the federal interest in protecting public health and safety is not for the federal government to seek an end to state legalization. To the contrary, Taylor asserts, a federal crackdown would backfire by producing an atomized, anarchic, state-legalized but unregulated marijuana market that federal drug enforcers could neither contain nor force the states to contain.

In this broad-ranging primer on the legal challenges surrounding marijuana legalization, Taylor makes the following points:

Stuart also surveys (1) what legalizing states can and cannot do without violating federal law; (2) the Obama’s administration’s approach to medical marijuana and; (3) current marijuana law at the federal level and in Colorado and Washington State.

Download and read the full paper » 

Author

Download Appendix 1: The Obama Administration’s Approach to Medical Marijuana: A Study in Chaos » 

Download Appendix 2: Conflict of Laws: A Quick Orientation to Marijuana Law at the Federal Level and in Colorado and Washington State » 

More

Get daily updates from Brookings