Anyone who tells you that they know how the euro crisis is going to be resolved is either lying to you or to themselves. The situation is so complex that several quite different paths are possible. In this type of situation, smart analysts use scenario analysis and strive to put probabilities on the different outcomes, without making the mistake of thinking they can predict the future with accuracy. Events can change perceptions of the probabilities quickly and significantly, which is why we observed so much market volatility surrounding recent statements by the head of the European Central Bank.
Why is the situation so complex? First, it involves at least six different types of crises that are interconnected, including:
- A competitiveness crisis in some European countries, like Greece and Portugal.
- A fiscal crisis in some of the same countries and some others, such as Belgium and Ireland.
- A crisis of national political institutions in countries like Greece and Italy.
- A crisis of pan-European institutions, which have been weakened by national leaders.
- A banking crisis, stemming from the financial crisis of 2007 onwards, aggravated by the euro crisis.
- A resulting crisis of investor confidence in the sovereign debt of the weaker countries.
Second, because the institutional framework of the euro area is weak, many critical decisions require unanimity among 17 countries and sometimes 27, if the European Union as a whole is involved. Third, because the best solutions will require politicians in the key countries to violate longstanding dogmas, with the resulting risk of losing the next election. These factors can combine in very unpredictable ways.
So, what are the main scenarios and their probabilities?
The Happy Scenario: A Gradual Workout of the Problems (10% probability)
There is a chance the major steps Europe has taken, usually reluctantly, will actually be enough to slowly get the continent past the immediate crises and give it the time to deal with the longer-run issues. European nations have agreed to major constraints on their deficits and have taken many actions to improve their economies. Perhaps these, and follow-on actions, will be enough.
The Most Likely Scenario: Things Get Worse Before They Get Better (65% probability)
I do not believe European leaders have yet done what they really need to do to restore market confidence. They have committed to major steps but expressed so many reservations and conditions about them that one cannot have complete confidence even if these steps were enough. I expect a blow-up somewhere in Europe — and there are many candidates for it — that will shake investor confidence in the euro area sufficiently to cause the closure of private funding markets for Spain or Italy, which would quickly spread to the other nations. This would be an intolerable situation, given the large size of these two countries, which could lead to a series of national defaults if the euro area failed to pull together quickly.
My belief in this scenario is that the key leaders would finally have a summit at which they all committed to the full extent to the actions needed to restore market confidence, in order to prevent total disaster. This would require the strong countries such as Germany to agree to back the debt of the weaker countries, through any one of a whole set of potential mechanisms, ranging from an outright debt guarantee to massive bond purchases by the European Stability Mechanism or the European Central Bank.
In return, the weaker countries would have to accept a strong degree of control of their budgets by European authorities, requiring many painful but necessary changes to the ways their economies operate. The International Monetary Fund would also be brought in, partly for its money but mostly as a relatively neutral arbiter to ensure the needed actions are taken. Finally, the banking systems in Europe would become subject to more-integrated European supervision and a pan-European deposit guarantee fund and mechanisms for dealing with failing banks.
The Disaster Scenario: It All Falls Apart (25% probability)
In this case, there is the same blow-up as projected in the likely scenario, but the leaders are unable to reach agreement at the key summit or the deal falls apart due to political pressures afterwards. The result is a series of national defaults in Greece (for the second time), Portugal, Spain, Italy, Ireland and possibly other countries, such as Belgium. Greece might be forced by circumstances to withdraw from the euro and it is possible that a few other countries would as well. Europe would fall into a deep recession, the U.S. into a mild recession, and the growth of countries such as China would slow markedly. The only real winner, if this unfolds rapidly enough, might be Mitt Romney, as a sinking U.S. economy would give him the election victory.
All Western democracies, including the U.S. and Germany, are seeing powerful protest movements against globalization and integration. They are agitating for a recapturing of control, or 'sovereignty,' and often also of ethnic homogeneity. Although they keep talking about the nation-state, they oppose key principles of Western constitutionalism like separation of powers and the protection of minorities against the tyranny of the majority. They want a tribalization of politics. That's something the Tea Party and the U.S. alt-right have in common with the AfD.
Germany's postwar foreign policy had two lodestars: atonement for World War II and the Holocaust, as well as reconciliation with its victims and enemies — and joining the universe of Western democracies, and specifically integration into the U.N., NATO, and the European Union. The AfD [Alternative for Germany] more or less explicitly rejects both these orienting principles in favor of an ethno-nationalist, sovereignist, anti-European, anti-American and pro-Russian stance.