A debate: Should crypto be regulated by the federal government?
Past Event
The explosion of interest in cryptocurrencies and the implosion of cryptocurrency exchange FTX shine a spotlight on the fact that today’s regulatory apparatus is ill-equipped to oversee this new financial technology. The Securities and Exchange Commission, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the comptroller of the currency, and the Federal Reserve are all wrestling with how best to oversee crypto. Several proposals are circulating in Congress. One camp argues that the risks to consumers and to financial stability demand a new rulebook. Another argues that regulating crypto would give it legitimacy and that it would be best to leave it alone.
On December 20, the Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy and the Center on Regulation and Markets hosted a virtual debate on this timely issue. Peter Conti-Brown of Penn Wharton and a nonresident fellow in Economic Studies argued for regulation, and Stephen Cecchetti of Brandeis International Business School argued against.
Viewers sent questions to events@brookings.edu, on Twitter using the hashtag #CryptoDebate and at sli.do using the code #CryptoDebate.
Agenda
YES, crypto should be regulated
Peter Conti-Brown
Class of 1965 Associate Professor of Financial Regulation - Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Nonresident Fellow - Economic Studies, The Brookings Institution
NO, crypto should not be regulated
Stephen G. Cecchetti
Rosen Family Chair in International Finance - Brandeis International Business School
Debate moderator
More Information
To subscribe or manage your subscriptions to our top event topic lists, please visit our event topics page.
