![A registered user sits in front of a screen while the language program ChatGPT, developed by the US company OpenAI, writes computer code based on artificial intelligence.](https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/2024-08-07T162006Z_1723047600_DPAF240807X99X32211_RTRFIPP_4_LANGUAGE-THECOMPANY-COMPUTER-INTELLIGENCE-PROGRAMS-CHATBOT-LANGUAGEPRO.jpg?quality=75&w=500)
![A registered user sits in front of a screen while the language program ChatGPT, developed by the US company OpenAI, writes computer code based on artificial intelligence.](https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/2024-08-07T162006Z_1723047600_DPAF240807X99X32211_RTRFIPP_4_LANGUAGE-THECOMPANY-COMPUTER-INTELLIGENCE-PROGRAMS-CHATBOT-LANGUAGEPRO.jpg?quality=75&w=500)
Research
BPEA | 1982 No. 11982, No. 1
RECENTLY the rational expectations school has mounted an attack on the conventional use of simultaneous equations models for policy analysis. One might go further and say that among academic macroeconomists the conventional methods have not just been attacked, they have been discredited. The practice of using econometric models to project the likely effects of different policy choices, then choosing the best from among the projected outcomes, is widely believed to be unjustifiable or even the primary source of recent problems of combined high inflation and low economic activity. Instead, it is claimed, policy analysis should be formulated as choice among rules of behavior for the policy authorities and estimates should be made of the stochastic properties of the economy under each proposed rule to choose the best.