Editor’s Note: In a recent compilation of commentary for the G8 Summit in Italy, Domenico Lombardi questions whether the G8 is leading the discussion on critical IMF governance reform and claims that the G20 may be better equipped to mobilize these issues. While the G8 may no longer be the guiding force behind the reform of the Bretton Woods Institutions, Lombardi states that it does provide an informal framework to discuss issues of common responsibility among its members. For instance, the G8 Summit should focus on the declining aid flows to poor countries and fulfilling its previous commitments to aid African growth.
The novelty of the current process of reforming the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is that heads of state and of government, through the G20 summits, have taken on a task traditionally assigned to their finance ministers. If this effort proves sustainable, there is an opportunity to address the greatest challenge that the IMF has faced since the end of the Bretton Woods era in the 1970s, when its member countries withdrew political capital, making the institution ineffective as a forum for multilateral discussions. This shift in authority, away from the IMF back to member countries, was a defining feature of its role that emerged after the demise of the Bretton Woods system, whereby national policymakers claimed for themselves more discretion in setting their economic policies.
The whole spirit of multilateralism is on life support. Normally you’d want to heap praise on some other country for taking on a larger share of this global burden, but Trump doesn’t think about global problems needing to be globally shared.