An Accelerated Pathway for Targeted Cancer Therapies

Joshua S. Benner,
Joshua S. Benner Former Brookings Expert, President and CEO - RxAnte
David Epstein, Stephen Friend,
Stephen Friend President and Co-Founder - Sage Bionetworks
Cindy Geoghegan,
Cindy Geoghegan Patient and Partners
David Kessler, Mark B. McClellan,
Mark B. McClellan Former Brookings Expert, Director, Margolis Center for Health Policy - Duke University
Richard Schilsky,
Richard Schilsky Chief Medical Officer - American Society of Clinical Oncology
David Sidransky, and
David Sidransky The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Ray Woosley

February 3, 2011

Despite important advances in understanding of the molecular mechanisms of cancer, the promise of targeted cancer therapy remains largely unfulfilled, with only a few well-known examples, such as trastuzumab, currently approved. One of the most significant challenges is the effective coordination of the development and regulatory review of targeted therapies and companion diagnostics. At least three issues underlie this challenge. First, no consensus exists on how to study a targeted therapy intended for use in a subpopulation defined by a molecular marker. Discussions by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee have suggested that clinical-trial participants should be stratified prospectively according to biomarker status and that treatment effects should be evaluated in both biomarker-positive and -negative populations. However, trastuzumab was approved for use in biomarker-positive patients without evaluation in the biomarker-negative subpopulation.

Second, there is additional uncertainty about which comparator therapy to use, because an acceptable treatment in an unselected population may have different efficacy in the ‘targeted’ population, or the ‘targeted’ population may have a different prognosis. Third, within the FDA, cancer drugs are reviewed by the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), whereas diagnostics are reviewed by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH). Co-development of a targeted therapy and a diagnostic therefore requires early agreement and coordination between product developers and these Centers on evidentiary standards and administrative procedures. Although the FDA has issued a concept paper on the co-development of drugs and diagnostics1, formal guidance that provides clear direction has not yet been developed. With the aim of helping to address these issues, we propose a pathway to enable and accelerate the development and approval of targeted cancer therapies and companion diagnostics.

Read the full article at Nature Reviews Drug Discovery »