In June 2002 hundreds of thousands of Korean citizens, participating in a series of candle-light vigils, protested against the acquittal of two U.S. soldiers charged with negligent homicide in the deaths of two teenage Korean girls during an off-base training exercise. The protesters also requested an apology from the U.S. and a major revision of the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), the legal code governing the U.S. soldiers stationed in the Republic of Korea (ROK). Some went even further by demanding the complete withdrawal of the U.S. Forces in Korea (USFK) and the termination of the U.S.-ROK security pact which has been a cornerstone of the close bilateral relationship for over fifty years. The magnitude and significance of the street protests were so great that, just days before the close of the tight presidential race later that year, the competing candidates each tried to tap into the rising tide of anti-American sentiment.
From an American perspective that considers the U.S. the ROK’s savior in the Korean War—and still deploys tens of thousands of soldiers to protect the ROK from its menacing neighbor to the north—such an aggressive and persistent hostility toward the U.S. represented ingratitude, even betrayal. As the election ended with a win for Roh Moo-hyun who, while a candidate, said that “he might offer to mediate if the U.S. and North Korea went to war,”1 American concerns toward the ROK appeared to have deepened.
[Kim Jong Un's succession and establishing Ri Sol Ju as the mother of the next North Korean leader] In the past his father and grandfather had multiple wives and there was intense jockeying about who was the heir. He knows the regime focuses on bloodlines, and he has Kim Il Sung’s blood in his veins...[Kim Jong Un] is the third Kim. Is he going to be the one that gives up nuclear weapons and makes North Korea beholden to outside powers? I doubt it.