A rising wave of extreme anti-Shiite sectarian violence is sweeping the Islamic world from Beirut to Bahrain and from Baghdad to Baluchistan. The mass slaughter of Shiites at the hands of extreme Sunni groups like al-Qaeda in Iraq and Lashkar-e-Jhangvi in Pakistan is unprecedented in modern Islamic history. Not since the Saudi and Wahhabi sack of Najaf and Karbala in 1806 has sectarian violence in the Middle East been this extreme.
The origins of this wave of extreme sectarianism are many and Iran cannot escape some responsibility for the backlash. Iran and Hezbollah encouraged Shiite identity and sectarian animosity for decades. The Assad family in Syria created a sectarian state where Alawis dominated Sunnis for many years, and when they fought back, their cities, such as Hama, were shelled into submission. Saddam Hussein brutally crushed the Shiite intifada in Iraq in 1991. The Iranian and Hezbollah intervention in Syria this spring has exacerbated the tensions to the boiling point.
But much of the blame today has to rest with the conscious decision of a Jordanian madman, Ahmad Fadil al-Khalayilah, better known as Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. Known inside al-Qaeda by his other nickname, “al-Gharib” or the stranger because of his extreme views, Zarqawi elevated violence against the Shiites of Iraq to levels not seen in the last two centuries. Beginning in 2003, Zarqawi targeted Shiite leaders, Shiite mosques and shrines and Shiite holy days for extreme acts of violence. Zarqawi likened his hundreds of Shiite victims to be modern-day Safavids — after the Shiite dynasty that made Iran a Shiite state — and saw himself and his al-Qaeda gang as reaping grim justice on Shiite “heretics.” Zarqawi never made any secret that his real target was the Safavid heartland itself, Iran.
This is what opaque, unaccountable, monarchic rule looks like. The way this was done is not a way that gives any transparency. If you’re another senior prince or another senior businessman, you don’t know what you can do to avoid a similar fate.