Skip to main content

Hutchins Center Fiscal Impact Measure

The Hutchins Center Fiscal Impact Measure shows how much fiscal policy adds to or subtracts from overall economic growth. Use the graph below to explore the total quarterly fiscal impact as well as its components: taxes and spending at the federal, state and local levels. (Methodology »)


Hutchins Center Fiscal Impact Measure Contribution of Fiscal Policy to Real GDP Growth Components of Fiscal Policy Contribution to Real GDP Growth

  • Four-quarter moving average
  • Quarterly fiscal impact
  • Federal spending on goods and services
  • State and local spending on goods and services
  • Taxes and benefit programs

Source: Hutchins Center calculations from Bureau of Economic Analysis data.

Hutchins Center on Fiscal & Monetary Policy

By Louise Sheiner and Sage Belz

The combined effect of federal, state and local spending and tax policies —which significantly restrained overall economic growth from 2011 through 2014— had little effect on growth in Gross Domestic Product in the second quarter of 2017, the latest reading on the Hutchins’ Fiscal Impact Measure shows.

The modestly positive impact of federal spending was offset by persistent weakness in state and local spending. Worries about unfunded pension liabilities and weaker than expected tax revenues this year appear to be restraining spending on both current operations and infrastructure.

The Hutchins’ FIM has been hovering near zero over the past year, suggesting that, on balance, local, state and federal fiscal policies have neither subtracted from nor added to the change in GDP. The GDP grew at a 3.0 percent annual rate in the quarter, according to the government’s second estimate.

A few highlights from the most recent update to the FIM:

  • Federal spending increased at an annual rate of 5 percent this quarter, but increased just ½ percentage point over the past year. Caps on discretionary spending agreed to by Congress have kept spending growth well below GDP growth.
  • Spending by state and local governments fell in the second quarter, a fifth consecutive quarter of negative or very weak growth. The sector has yet to fully recover from the Great Recession: state and local employment remains almost 1 percent lower than it was in 2008, and inflation-adjusted construction spending is about 25 percent lower. Growing pension obligations and negative revenue surprises have pushed states and localities to restrict budgets. Pension contributions as a share of payroll, for example, have increased almost 6 percentage points since 2008.
  • Tax and transfer policies at all levels of government have had little effect on GDP growth over the past year, reflecting the lack of major legislative changes at either the federal or state and local levels. If the Trump administration and Congress agree on major tax cuts or on increases or decreases in federal spending, the FIM will provide a gauge of their near-term effects on GDP growth.
Get daily updates from Brookings