U.S.-Russia Relations: Beyond the Crisis in Ukraine
Past Event
With the ongoing crisis in eastern Ukraine, and Russia seizing control of Crimea in early 2014, tensions between Russia and the United States have been particularly high over the past several months. The conflict over Ukraine comes amid other disagreements between the United States and Russia, including those related to missile defense and the wars in Syria and Libya, the Edward Snowden affair, and NATO enlargement. Yet the two countries also have many common interests as reflected, for example, in policy towards Iran and Afghanistan and, to some extent, North Korea.
On October 20, the Center for 21st Century Security and Intelligence at Brookings hosted Moscow-based Victoria Panova, director general at the Global Reform Fund, for a panel discussion on the future of relations between the United States and Russia. Panova was joined by Brookings Senior Fellow Steven Pifer and Fellow Jeremy Shapiro. Michael O’Hanlon, co-director of the Center for 21st Century Security and Intelligence, moderated the discussion.
Agenda
Panelists
Jeremy Shapiro
Nonresident Senior Fellow - Foreign Policy, Center on the United States and Europe, Project on International Order and Strategy
Moderator
Michael E. O’Hanlon
Director of Research - Foreign Policy
Co-Director - Center for Security, Strategy, and Technology, Africa Security Initiative
Senior Fellow - Foreign Policy, Center for Security, Strategy, and Technology
The Sydney Stein, Jr. Chair
More Information
To subscribe or manage your subscriptions to our top event topic lists, please visit our event topics page.
AAPI Heritage Month: Safeguarding Asian American inclusion and belonging
President López Obrador's extension of the term of Supreme Court chief Arturo Zaldívar is part of his strong effort to recentralize power in the Mexican presidency and hollow out the independence and power of other Mexican institutions. His other moves to bend the justice system to his will include a reform that lowered the salary of judges but did not improve the quality of prosecutors and his unwillingness to allow an independent selection of the attorney general, with López Obrador himself retaining the power of appointment. His latest move with the two-year extension of Zaldívar’s term is especially worrisome. Zaldívar is also the president of the powerful Federal Judiciary Council. The council appoints and dismisses judges, sets career advancement rules and disciplines judges. Zaldívar will be setting the council’s and, thus, the whole judiciary’s, agenda and priorities for two years. This allows López Obrador to influence how courts will rule in cases regarding the executive branch, what cases they take up and the legality of new policies. These moves are taking place when the effectiveness of the judiciary in Mexico remains limited and deeply concerning. The attorney general’s office has proven weak, unwilling to take up key cases such as against the suspects in the brazen attack on Mexico City’s security minister, Omar García Harfuch—an event that symbolized the impunity with which Mexican criminal groups operate. Mexico’s justice system showed itself equally meek and disappointing in inadequately investigating the alleged complicity of former Mexican Defense Minister Salvador Cienfuegos and dismissing the case, potentially the most significant case of corruption and criminal collusion charges against a high-ranking Mexican official in two decades. A decade and a half after Mexico initiated its justice system reforms, 95 percent of federal cases still go unpunished. President López Obrador has scored some points, but the already precariously weak rule of law in Mexico, and thus the Mexican people, will suffer.