Taiwan’s Legislative Yuan: Oversight or Overreach?
As Taiwan consolidates its democratic system of government, it must enhance the roles and performance of its Legislative Yuan (LY). Currently, the LY has a complex and variable role in the deepening engagement between the governments of Taiwan and mainland China, a fact that was crystallized by a 24-day student-led occupation of the legislative chamber in March and April. The occupation and other protests against the handling of the Cross-Strait Trade in Services Agreement, signed by Taipei and Beijing in 2013, have focused earlier calls for an “oversight mechanism” through which the LY can play a formal role in shaping, monitoring, and ratifying cross-strait agreements and several proposals are now under consideration.
On Monday, June 23, the Brookings Center for East Asia Policy Studies will host a public seminar to examine prospects and best practices for legislative oversight in an advanced democracy. Experts from Taiwan and the United States will describe existing legislative oversight mechanisms in Taiwan, Japan, and the United States; will review how existing procedures have been utilized in Taiwan; and will analyze current proposals for an oversight mechanism. Su Chi, a former LY member (2005-2008) and former secretary-general of the National Security Council (2008-2010), will make an opening statement describing the LY’s procedures and practices and its interaction with the executive branch of government.
After each session, panelists will take audience questions.
Associate Professor, Department of Political Science - University of California, Los Angeles
Research Fellow, Institute of Political Science - Academia Sinica
Chairman - The Taipei Forum Foundation
Visiting Scholar in China Studies, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies - Johns Hopkins University
Assistant Research Fellow, Institute of Political Science - Academia Sinica
Director, Asia Program - Foreign Policy Research Institute
To subscribe or manage your subscriptions to our top event topic lists, please visit our event topics page.
"There are concerns that placing the [Israeli] embassy in Jerusalem would be a sign that the United States recognizes it as a part of Israel's sovereign territory, even though the position of the U.S. over the last 70 years or so is that Jerusalem is actually disputed territory, and that the status of it will have to be resolved through negotiations."
"I would be surprised if the State Department interpreted the Jerusalem Embassy Act as requiring it to break ground on a new embassy facility or take other such steps. The plain language of the statute only requires that the secretary of state determine and report to Congress that the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem has officially opened."