Bush Picks Wrong Time for Leadership Change at IRS

April 7, 2002

As we approach the tax deadline of April 15, there is good and bad news. The good news is that the Internal Revenue Service is in the midst of one of the greatest turnarounds in modern bureaucratic history. Today, the IRS is a much friendlier, more effective agency. If Americans have to pay taxes, at least they can do so with greater confidence that their questions will receive faster, more accurate answers; their refunds will arrive sooner; and payments due will get to the right place. Paying taxes will never be painless, but it’s become less of an ordeal.

The bad news is that the man most responsible for this turnaround, IRS Commissioner Charles Rossotti, will leave at the end of his five-year term. The White House has started searching for his successor, hiring a Dallas-based recruiting firm to do the job. Early indications are that loyalty to the Bush administration will be more important in filling the job than management expertise. The firm inadvertently leaked an e-mail that said the president prefers someone who is “definitely not a tax attorney and does not need to have any in-depth exposure to the tax system or code.” The taxpayers deserve better.

Rossotti came to the IRS under the worst of circumstances. The agency was battling a taxpayer abuse scandal, its toll-free telephone lines were clogged and its organization chart was harder to navigate than the Amazon River.

It is one thing to attempt a turnaround when you have a clear mission, strong support and rising appropriations. It is quite another when you are about to take the helm of America’s most despised government agency. Rossotti faced two choices: tinker around the edges of his embattled agency or embrace top-to-bottom reform. Rossotti took the latter course and that has made all the difference.

Rossotti’s turnaround strategy involved four elements:

Flattening the IRS’ hierarchy, and removing entire layers of needless management from the agency’s organization chart. Where the agency once had five layers of management in its service centers and call sites, it now has three.

Consolidating the agency’s field offices into an integrated whole. Before Rossotti arrived, many IRS offices had incompatible e-mail, phone and accounting systems.

Organizing the agency around taxpayers, not the tax code. Rossotti established four divisions to serve small businesses and the self-employed, large and mid-sized companies, individual wage and investment earners, and tax-exempt and government entities.

Focusing on a balanced set of performance measures rather than the small sums that come from property seizures and enforcement of tax laws. Rossotti placed a premium on service. That meant ensuring fairness and consistency across field offices and throughout the corps of revenue agents.

Not everything has been a success. The IRS’ Washington hierarchy remains almost as dense today as it was when Rossotti arrived. And the agency is still saddled with tax records that must be maintained on magnetic tape.

But there are signs of turnaround. Currently, the IRS can’t account for 2,200 of its more than 160,000 computers. But, five years ago, the agency couldn’t account for any of its computers in a timely fashion, let alone find out which ones had been lost or stolen. Today, the agency knows exactly where 98 percent of its computers are, including all but 19 of the 38,600 computers installed in the last two fiscal years. That is a loss rate of just one out of every 2,000 of its newest computers, a rate well below that of most private companies.

The turnaround is far from complete. Computer modernization is still under way, and the IRS has yet to complete the cultural transformation needed to make the changes stick. It is not enough just to change the organization chart and utter a new motto, and Rossotti knows it.

That is why Rossotti’s impending departure is so troubling. Few private companies would ask their chief executive officer to design, launch and complete a transformation in five years, then replace him a year after the reorganization took place. They would keep the CEO on long enough to complete the transformation.

Much as they long for a Republican at the IRS’ helm, administration officials would do well to ask Rossotti to stay a year, or five, longer.