Seven years ago I published a set of projections suggesting that the emerging middle class in developing countries was about to surge (Kharas, 2010). I argued further that demand from this segment of the market could drive global economic growth and partly offset lower demand among middle-class consumers in developed countries who were struggling to deal with the shocks to their living standards caused by the Great Recession.1
Since then, four relevant developments have shaped middle-class calculations, and the first two of these turn out to have quantitatively important implications for overall estimates of trends and levels. First, a survey of purchasing power parity (PPP) prices, conducted in 2011, has replaced the previous 2005 PPP survey (World Bank, 2015) as the basis for comparing real income levels across countries. The 2011 survey differs not just in updating price levels, but also uses a new methodology for generating country-level data. The results have markedly changed and improved our understanding of countries’ and households’ relative economic strength. In brief, Asian and African countries were estimated to be far richer, compared to other countries, than previously imagined, by 18 to 26 percent in several cases (Deaton and Aten 2015).
The second development has been the continued weakness in global economic growth. Global recovery has fallen short of forecasts and remains weaker than the recovery from previous recessions (although perhaps in line with the rate of recovery from previous financial crises). Major institutions have sequentially and continuously downgraded their growth forecasts. The hoped-for “green shoots” have not materialized. A series of shocks, most recently the collapse of oil andother commodity prices, have reduced income levels in the short run, while deeper analysis of the data has led to a rethinking of long-run potential growth prospects (Summers 2016; Rachel and Smith, 2015).
The third development is the continued improvement of GDP data. In some countries, there has been a rebasing of national accounts leading to significant revisions of estimated output and national income; for example, Nigeria increased its estimate of the sizeof its economy by more than three-quarters in 2014 (Magnowski, 2014).
Fourth, new household surveys have permitted a more up-to-date assessment of income distribution at a time of significant changes in within-country inequality, and, in some cases, allow for direct measurement of the middle class for the first time.
The purpose of this paper is to assess the impact of these four improvements and the updates to the underlying data on the evolution of the global middle class.
A larger middle-class population and market has significant environment and social implications. Naturally, assuming technology does not change, the carbon footprint per person will rise as the middle class expands. Two mitigating factors could limit the extent of this. First, middle-class growth is associated with migration from rural to urban areas and, for a given level of income, households in urban areas tend to have a smaller carbon footprint than households in rural areas, especially for transport. Second, middle-class households tend to invest more in their children’s education and this, in turn, can reduce fertility rates and decrease the long-term population trajectory for the world.
-
Footnotes
- Throughout this paper, I use “developed countries” and “developing countries” alongside “advanced economies” and “emerging economies” to describe country groups. Though these terms have no exact definitions, they are in common use and so used here with no prejudice as to the level of development of any particular country. When referring to data sourced from the IMF, I use emerging economies as shorthand for “emerging and developing” economies.
The Brookings Institution is committed to quality, independence, and impact.
We are supported by a diverse array of funders. In line with our values and policies, each Brookings publication represents the sole views of its author(s).