Should the ceiling on deposit insurance be lifted? A debate
Co-hosted by the Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy and the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton Initiative on Financial Policy and Regulation
Past Event
You can read a summary of this debate here.
The U.S. insures bank deposits up to $250,000 per account. In March, invoking an emergency provision that’s known as the “systemic risk exemption,” the government extended the insurance to all deposits at the failed Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, both of which have substantial sums in accounts over $250,000. That has prompted calls to lift the $250,000 ceiling for all banks, a change that would require Congressional approval.
On April 5, Brookings’ Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy and the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton Initiative on Financial Policy and Regulation hosted a debate on whether the cap should be lifted entirely (Prasad Krishnamurthy, Berkeley Law), lifted with restrictions (Peter Conti-Brown, Penn Wharton), or kept as is (Thomas Philippon, NYU Stern; Patricia McCoy, Boston College Law). Kelly Evans of CNBC moderated the debate.
Viewers submitted questions by emailing events@brookings.edu, on Twitter using the hashtag #depositinsurance, or at sli.do using the code #depositinsurance.
Agenda
Welcome
David Wessel
Director - The Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy
Senior Fellow - Economic Studies
Debate
Peter Conti-Brown
Class of 1965 Associate Professor of Financial Regulation - Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Nonresident Fellow - Economic Studies, The Brookings Institution
Prasad Krishnamurthy
Professor of Law - Berkeley Law
Patricia McCoy
Liberty Mutual Insurance Professor of Law - Boston College Law
Thomas Philippon
Max L. Heine Professor of Finance, Stern School of Business - New York University
More Information
To subscribe or manage your subscriptions to our top event topic lists, please visit our event topics page.