Sections

Research

AI safety governance, the Southeast Asian way

Lyantoniette Chua,
Lyantoniette Chua Co-Founder - AI Safety Asia (AISA)
Philip Tham, and
Philip Tham Analyst - AI Safety Asia (AISA)
Chinasa T. Okolo

August 26, 2025


  • Parts of Southeast Asia are highly digitally connected and have seen exciting developments, yet voices from the region are often underrepresented in conversations around AI safety.
  • Some countries in the region are more mature in this field, and examining their current state can help understand how to harmonize approaches to strengthen capacity building, research, and catastrophic risk management.
  • Shaped by its cultural diversity, political pluralism, and varied levels of development, Southeast Asia’s approach to AI safety governance combines localized, context-aware regulation with regional coordination, distilling lessons that could be applicable to other global majority regions.
ASEAN member nation flags
A woman walks past flags of ASEAN member nations. REUTERS/Adrees Latif (THAILAND)

Conversations around AI safety are largely dominated by the United States, Europe, and China, leaving Southeast Asian voices underrepresented in broader global AI governance discourse. Still, countries in this region have made important strides in digital and AI policy, recognizing the opportunities presented by AI while adopting nuanced and pragmatic approaches to AI safety and development.  

This report, “AI Safety Governance, The Southeast Asian Way,” outlines recent AI governance developments in 11 Southeast Asian countries: Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Timor-Leste, and Vietnam. Recommendations were in part developed through six roundtable discussions organized by AI Safety Asia (AISA), gathering insights from stakeholders ranging from government officials to the private sector, academia, and civil society. These conversations were used to identify regional priority areas for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and national governments over the next five years to develop comprehensive and future-proof approaches to AI safety. National governments can pursue pragmatic and impactful strategies while actively engaging with regional and international partners. To avoid friction between differing national strategies, ASEAN should harmonize approaches across the region and strengthen cooperation around capacity building, research, and risk management. The report also identifies several persistent challenges and gaps in AI policy across the region, such as developing national AI risk management plans. 

The Southeast Asian approach to AI governance also provides valuable lessons for other global majority countries crafting AI strategies. Given the incredible diversity of the region, Southeast Asian countries have taken a context-aware approach to AI policy, prioritizing open-source AI development, developing multilingual large language models (LLMs), and designing inclusive AI governance processes. Finally, this report serves as a call to action for countries in the region to address major gaps in policy, to usher in an inclusive, safe, and innovative AI future in Southeast Asia. 

Download the full report

Authors

The Brookings Institution is committed to quality, independence, and impact.
We are supported by a diverse array of funders. In line with our values and policies, each Brookings publication represents the sole views of its author(s).