Skip to main content
Newly manufactured cars of the automobile maker Honda await export at port in Yokohama, south of Tokyo June 23, 2015. Japanese manufacturing activity contracted slightly in June as new orders fell and output growth slowed in a sign the economy may have lost some momentum. REUTERS/Toru Hanai - RTX1HO9G



Satoshi Inomata

Chief Senior Researcher - Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization



Senior Researcher - Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization

Zhi Wang

Professor and Director - Research Center of Global Value Chains, University of International Business and Economics (Beijing)


Nadim Ahmad

Head of Trade and Competitiveness Statistics Division - Statistics Directorate, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development


Annalisa Primi

Head of Structural Policies and Innovation Unit - Development Centre, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development


Jakob Engel

Economist - Trade and Competitiveness, World Bank


Cecilia Heuser

Research Analyst - Development Economics Research Group, World Bank

Aaditya Mattoo

Research Manager - Trade and International Integration, World Bank


Matthew Kidder

Assistant Professor - University of International Business and Economics

Michele Ruta

Lead Economist, Macroeconomics, Trade & Investment - World Bank


Jose Guilherme Reis

Lead Economist, Finance, Private Sector and Infrastructure Group in Latin America and the Caribbean

Global value chains (GVCs) break up the production process so different steps can be carried out in different countries. Many smart phones and televisions, for example, are designed in the United States or Japan. They have sophisticated inputs, such as semiconductors and processors, which are produced in the Republic of Korea or Chinese Taipei. And they are assembled in China. They are then marketed and receive after-sale servicing in Europe and the United States. These complex global production arrangements have transformed the nature of trade. But their complexity has also created difficulties in understanding trade and in formulating policies that allow firms and governments to capitalize on GVCs and to mitigate negative side effects.

Today’s official statistical information systems, designed to measure economic activity in a pre-GVC world, have struggled to keep pace with these changes. Conventional measures of trade, important though they remain, measure the gross value of transactions between partners and so are not able to reveal how foreign producers, upstream in the value chain, are connected to final consumers at the end of the value chain. For example, conventional statistics suggest that the Republic of Korea exports a lot to China. In fact, much of this trade consists of components that are ultimately destined for the European and U.S. markets. So it would be more accurate to say for these products that Korea exports a lot to advanced consumer markets.

The importance of the GVC phenomenon has stimulated researchers to develop statistics and analysis based on the value added in trade. The GVC phenomenon also demands that researchers analyze the discrete tasks or phases in the production process. Data are now available on the value added traded among major economies during 1995–2014. This first Global Value Chain Development Report draws on the expanding research that uses data on the value added in trade. Its main objective is to reveal the changing nature of international trade that can be seen only by analyzing it in terms of value added and value chains.


Get daily updates from Brookings