According to best estimates, by early 2014, there were over 30 million people who had been internally displaced by conflict and human rights violations. This was the highest number ever recorded and over 25 times the number of internally displaced persons (IDPs) counted in 1982. Some of this increase is undoubtedly the result of better and more comprehensive means of estimating the number of IDPs, but it also reflects the increasingly protracted nature of displacement, as well as the increasing use of displacement as a strategy in civil conflicts.
Like refugees, IDPs are people who have been forced to flee but unlike refugees, they remain within the national borders of their home state or the state where they habitually reside. As a result, IDPs are the legal responsibility of national governments rather than that of other states or international organizations like the UN. Therefore it is considerably harder for the United Nations, NGOs or other organizations and institutions to provide assistance and protection to them – even when their governments are unable or unwilling to do so. Furthermore, there is no binding convention or specific UN agency responsible for IDPs. While refugees have benefited from the 1951 Refugee Convention and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), IDPs have often been on the receiving end of ad hoc responses. Indeed, it was not until the 1990s that normative frameworks began to be formalized for this group.Thus, it is very important to trace both the historical development of these normative frameworks, and to consider achievements, challenges and potential improvements for IDP protection.
While internal displacement is certainly not “new,” the way it is understood, studied and responded to has evolved over time among policymakers, practitioners, scholars and IDPs themselves. In the last 25 years, significant momentum in the development of normative standards relating to internal displacement, has translated into important outcomes in the lives of IDPs. The most noteworthy accomplishment was the development of the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement in 1998 which set the foundation for global, regional and national approaches and initiatives to internal displacement. The Guiding Principles were presented to the then-UN Commission on Human Rights and were affirmed five years later by the World Summit – a clear sign that issues of internal displacement belonged on the international agenda.
Yet despite the development of normative frameworks, IDP needs and vulnerabilities are still not adequately addressed and there is much work to be done to ensure that the rights of IDPs are upheld. This report maps some of the key normative developments on internal displacement over recent decades, based on the 2012 report to the Secretary-General by Special Rapporteur on the human rights of internally displaced persons, Chaloka Beyani.
If Trump and his group hoped that this kind of tough talk would make the North Koreans nervous, and make them come back with their tail between their legs — no, that’s just not the way they work. This is a stupid move. By pushing North Korea away, in such an in-your-face way, he’s pushing them to work separately with the South Koreans and the Chinese.