It’s time to end the trade secret evidentiary privilege among forensic algorithm vendors Rebecca Wexler Tuesday, July 13, 2021
Why the World Anti-doping Agency should revisit its cannabis ban Rashawn Ray and John Hudak Tuesday, July 13, 2021
6 lessons from holding virtual focus groups during the COVID-19 pandemic Damilola Iyiola and Laura Keen Results for Development Monday, July 12, 2021
TechTank Podcast Episode 23: How should universities deal with student cheating? Darrell M. West Monday, July 12, 2021
Beyond Trump’s flimsy lawsuits, there’s a proper path for regulating social media Mark MacCarthy The Hill Monday, July 12, 2021
4-day school weeks: Educational innovation or detriment? Paul Thompson and Emily Morton Monday, July 12, 2021
The Biden administration takes an overdue first step to foster competition Bill Baer Saturday, July 10, 2021
![Fingerprints for a John Doe on Tuesday, September 17, 2019 at the Columbus Division of Police Forensic Services Center in Columbus, Ohio. In a Nov. 18, 2020, letter to law enforcement and courts, Attorney General Dave Yost's office reinforced their legal obligation to provide fingerprints and arrest records to keep updated state records used to run background checks for those purchasing guns or obtaining a concealed carry permit. [Joshua A. Bickel/Dispatch]Mt Crime Lab Jb 16](https://i0.wp.com/www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/2020-11-20T180544Z_1078310140_MT1USATODAY15216307_RTRMADP_3_FINGERPRINTS-FOR-A-JOHN-DOE-ON-TUESDAY-SEPTEMBER-17-2019.jpg?w=234&crop=0%2C11px%2C100%2C134px&ssl=1)
