Roberta Cohen is Co-Director of the Brookings Institution-CUNY Graduate Center Project on Internal Displacement, Senior Adviser to the Representative of the Secretary-General on Internally Displaced Persons, and co-author with Francis M. Deng of
Masses in Flight: The Global Crisis of Internal Displacement
It is a great pleasure to be in Oslo again. I would like to thank the Norwegian Refugee Council and its Secretary-General Steinar Sorlie and the Global IDP Project led by Marc Vincent for the important work they are doing worldwide for internally displaced persons, for the collaboration they have extended to the Representative of the UN Secretary-General on Internally Displaced Persons Francis Deng, and for today’s program which focuses on an aspect of internal displacement often overlooked – the response strategies of the internally displaced and how the international community can support these strategies.
The Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement, about which I have been asked to speak, are an important tool for internally displaced persons. Presented to the United Nations in 1998, they are the first international standards for internally displaced persons. They consist of 30 principles, which identify the rights of the internally displaced and the obligations of governments and insurgent groups toward these populations. They also provide guidance to all other actors engaged with the internally displaced – in particular international organizations and non-governmental organizations. They cover all phases of displacement – prior to displacement (the right not to be displaced), during displacement, and during return or resettlement and reintegration. They are based on international human rights law, international humanitarian law, and refugee law by analogy and indeed bring together into one document all the provisions of international human rights and humanitarian law relevant to the internally displaced. What is unique about the Principles is that in addition to restating provisions of existing law, they tailor the provisions of the law to the specific needs of the internally displaced.
The Principles were developed by a team of international legal experts under the direction of the Representative of the Secretary-General and in consultation with a wide range of international organizations, NGOs and research institutions worldwide. Although they are not a legally binding document like a treaty, since their presentation to the UN Commission on Human Rights in 1998, they have fast acquired a good deal of international standing, moral authority and acceptance. One reason is that they are based on and are consistent with binding law. Another reason is the overriding need for a document relevant to the internally displaced. Prior to their preparation, there was no one document to turn to on internal displacement. As a result, international organizations, regional bodies, non-governmental groups and a growing number of governments have acknowledged the Principles and are using them as a basis for policy and law. Indeed, a unanimously adopted resolution by fifty-three states in the April 2001 UN Commission on Human Rights recognized that an increasing number of states, UN agencies, and regional and non-governmental organizations are making use of the Guiding Principles. The resolution called for their further dissemination and application.
How can the Guiding Principles support the response strategies of the internally displaced. There are five principal ways.
First, the Guiding Principles provide a framework for understanding the problem. In many countries, internally displaced people do not realize that they have certain rights or that local authorities have obligations toward them. They are not aware of internal displacement as a phenomenon or realize that there are people in other countries suffering from the same problem or that there are international approaches being developed to address the problem. In Indonesia, for example, I found internally displaced persons so interested in learning about a document that explained their plight; I also found them so interested in learning that internal displacement was not limited to Indonesia, but was a worldwide problem for which solutions were being sought and that there might even be an emerging international responsibility toward internally displaced persons. In Macedonia, where I have been on two different occasions to lead discussions on internal displacement and the Principles, displaced persons were interested in learning more about their situation – which is a new one for Macedonia – and how it compared with other situations in Europe. The Principles thus are a valuable framework for promoting a greater understanding of what is happening to people when they become forcibly displaced.
Second, the Guiding Principles are an empowerment tool. When displaced people learn that certain standards do exist bearing on their plight, it gives them ideas for empowering themselves. Just look at the language of the Guiding Principles. They assert, for example, that internally displaced persons have the right to request and receive protection and humanitarian assistance from national authorities. They speak of participation of internally displaced persons in planning and distributing supplies and in planning and managing their returns and reintegration. This is empowerment language. I saw this to be the case in Colombia when meeting with a group of internally displaced women from all parts of the country. Despite the security threats they faced and the material deprivation they suffered, they were heartened to learn that a document existed with articles specific to their particular needs. In particular Principle 20 on the right to documentation and on the right of women to have documents in their own name resonated with these women. This is something they could use, they said. Right now, the Brookings-CUNY Project on Internal Displacement, which I co-direct, is working with NGOs in Colombia to develop an outreach campaign to displaced communities based on the Guiding Principles so that these communities can better use the Principles in support of their own response strategies.
Third, the Guiding Principles are a monitoring tool. Indeed, they are a valuable benchmark for measuring conditions in a country. At present, regional and nongovernmental organizations are monitoring conditions in particular countries in terms of the Principles. But displaced communities can begin to undertake monitoring as well. One can see the beginnings of this in Colombia, Sri Lanka, Georgia and Macedonia, where the Principles have been translated into the local languages, and outreach programs are underway.
Fourth, the Guiding Principles can serve as an advocacy tool. Of course, this works best when internally displaced persons are already in conditions of relative safety and can pursue advocacy vis-a-vis their local and national authorities. In the Southern Caucasus, for example, internally displaced persons are working together with lawyers in Georgia, Azerbaijan and Armenia to examine the laws and regulations in their countries in terms of the Guiding Principles and to advocate for legislative reform. When discriminatory electoral laws were identified in Georgia, a group of IDPs made an appeal to the supreme court. When the court did not rule in their favor, the internally displaced together with NGOs appealed to the government, which announced at the UN that it would explore bringing this particular law and other laws into line with the relevant provisions in the Guiding Principles. Another compelling example can be found in Sri Lanka where an NGO consortium (the Consortium of Humanitarian Agencies) organized a meeting between IDP camp commanders and IDP representatives, using the Guiding Principles as the framework. At the meeting, the representatives of the internally displaced advocated for better conditions, in particular more ample food rations, more timely deliveries of food, clean water, and more personal security in the camps. They found the Principles a valuable vehicle for making their concerns known.
Fifth, the Guiding Principles define “protection” for the internally displaced and provide a framework for developing protection strategies. Internally displaced persons not only need food, medicine and shelter. They also require protection of their personal security and human rights. Indeed, internally displaced persons often point out that protection against assault, rape and forced recruitment is as essential to them as material assistance. And while there is no international consensus on who should undertake protection activities in support of the response strategies of the displaced, the Handbook for Applying the Guiding Principles, published by the UN and the Brookings Institution, does set forth the kinds of steps that can be taken to enhance protection for the internally displaced. It contains sections on “What You Can Do,” which offers a framework for a protection strategy. The Handbook, for example, suggests that channels of communication should be opened between displaced communities and national or local authorities, and it shows how international organizations and NGOs can assist in achieving this. It also calls for members of displaced communities to visit proposed relocation sites with a view to evaluating their safety. On a trip to Angola last year, the Representative of the Secretary-General recommended that NGOs and international organizations in consultation with displaced populations develop protection strategies using the Guiding Principles and Handbook as the base.
Of course, to be widely used the Guiding Principles have to be translated into local languages. Thus far, the UN has translated the Guiding Principles into its 6 working languages. In addition, governments, UN agencies, and international and local NGOs have had the Principles translated into 15 other languages. But that is hardly enough because requests come in regularly from different countries. For example, there are requests from Uganda to translate the Principles into Gulu for use in IDP camps, from Iraq to translate the Principles into Kurdish, from East Timor to translate the Principles into Tetum, from the Sudan to translate the Principles into Dinka. Priority needs to be given to these requests by the UN and resources made available.
The Handbook for Applying the Guiding Principles also must be translated and disseminated in the more than 40 countries affected by internal displacement. Here, an even worse deficiency exists. The Handbook exists at the UN in published form in English only, even though the Handbook sets forth — and indeed is the only text that does set forth — what international organizations, NGOs and internally displaced persons can do to reinforce response strategies. Unfortunately, the United Nations has not fully focused on the importance of empowering local displaced communities as reflected in the fact that it has not initiated translations of this booklet into the UN’s working languages or developed outreach strategies to use the booklet in these languages. To fill this gap, the Brookings-CUNY Project had the Handbook translated into French recently, and the UN has agreed to publish it. Next, we will fund the translation of the Handbook into Russian and will again ask the UN to publish it. In Colombia, NGOs and the Pan American Health Organization have translated the Handbook into Spanish and the Brookings-CUNY Project has agreed to help with the publication and dissemination of the booklet in Latin America. But translations of the Handbook are needed not only into the UN’s working languages but also into local languages. And outreach campaigns need to be developed to disseminate the Principles to internally displaced persons. In the field, some initiative has begun to be shown by the UN. In Indonesia, for example, the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), together with the Brookings-CUNY Project, is having the Handbook translated into Bahasa Indonesia, and an outreach campaign is being developed by OCHA and OXFAM. This kind of program should be replicated in other countries. In Sri Lanka, with help from UNHCR, the Norwegian Refugee Council and the Brookings-CUNY Project, an NGO consortium has published a Toolkit in English, Sinhala and Tamil, based on the Guiding Principles and the Handbook, to help empower and strengthen the capacities of internally displaced persons. In addition, the University of Skopje, with support from UNHCR and the Brookings-CUNY Project, has translated the Principles and the Handbook into Macedonian and Albanian. But the UN must give greater priority to this effort and hopefully will through its newly formed IDP Unit, headed by Kofi Asomani.
Strengthening the response strategies of the internally displaced is one of the most important ways we can help internally displaced persons. As emphasized in the Norwegian Refugee Council’s new book, Caught Between Borders, internally displaced persons are not just victims but resources. We must work to reinforce their capacities and help provide them with the tools they can use to help themselves and in the languages in which they need them.
In closing, I’d like to recount an experience from the human rights arena to emphasize the importance of making the Guiding Principles and Handbook available to displaced populations. Back in the 1970s, through my human rights work I had the occasion to meet a Soviet dissident who had been confined to a psychiatric hospital because of his political views. He had been injected with painful drugs, abused, and partially starved. Because of an international campaign, he was released. When I met him in New York, I couldn’t help but ask him: “How did you get through all of this?” In response, he took a crumpled piece of paper from his back pocket, and said, “This is how.” The paper was the text of the International Covenants on Human Rights, the UN adopted standards on civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights. This man had memorized them and knew them by heart. When I asked him how it was possible that this document had sustained him when his government did not abide by the standards in the Covenants, he replied: “Oh, they know about them, they adopted resolutions on them at the UN, in fact they have ratified them, and one day they will have to observe them.” Holding up the Covenants, he said, “This document has power.” He proved to be right. And I believe this story should be instructive for today’s discussions about the Guiding Principles and how they can reinforce the response strategies of the internally displaced.
Financial tools for US policy toward Nicaragua and Venezuela: A conversation with Treasury Assistant Secretary Marshall Billingslea
I’m sure the demise of a Washington Post journalist is not a priority for a ‘fake news’ president. I don’t think the Trump administration is going to do anything about Khashoggi... Saudi Arabia is an absolute monarchy, but that said, it has behaved within international norms for the most part. It did not used to kidnap and murder critics in such an egregious way. It didn’t round up hundreds of its own citizens and shake them down in a Ritz-Carlton [as Mohammed bin Salman did last fall]. It has not put a former crown prince under house arrest. This … reflects the somewhat precarious nature of bin Salman’s position. His legitimacy is open, and his judgment is reckless. Saudi royal family members have gone out of their way to say [the war in Yemen] was not a family decision... [bin Salman] continues to enjoy the protection of his father, and that’s what’s crucial. But I would not be surprised if he were moved out of the line of succession or there was an assassination attempt.