The following testimony was given to the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Health on February 26, 2025. Video of the hearing is available here.
Matthew Fiedler testified at a hearing held by the Health Subcommittee of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) reform. His testimony addressed how the market for PBM services is working, as well as the potential—and limits—of recent reform proposals. It made four main points:
- The market for PBM services features limited competition, which likely allows PBMs to charge prices that exceed their cost of delivering services.
- Greater transparency could reduce the price of PBM services, albeit likely modestly.
- Proposed restrictions on how payers compensate PBMs would have more complex effects on payers, both positive and negative.
- If the goal is to make prescription drug coverage work better, PBM reform is one piece of the puzzle, but perhaps not the most important one.
-
Acknowledgements and disclosures
The author thanks Loren Adler and Richard Frank for helpful conversations and comments on an earlier draft.
The Brookings Institution is committed to quality, independence, and impact.
We are supported by a diverse array of funders. In line with our values and policies, each Brookings publication represents the sole views of its author(s).
Commentary
TestimonyMatthew Fiedler’s testimony on pharmacy benefit manager reform
February 26, 2025