The Brookings Institution is committed to quality, independence, and impact.
We are supported by a diverse array of funders. In line with our values and policies, each Brookings publication represents the sole views of its author(s).

Research
BPEA | 1993: Microeconomics 1Microeconomics 1, 1993
EDUCATIONAL AND POLITICAL LEADERS are calling for improvements in the signaling and certification of worker skills. During the 1992 election campaign, President Bill Clinton called for “a national examination system to measure our students’ and schools’ progress” in meeting the national educational standards. In 1989 the Secretary of Labor’s Commission on Workforce Quality urged schools to “develop easily understood transcripts which at the request of students, are readily available to employers. These transcripts should contain documentable measures of achievement in a variety of fields as well as attendance records.” For educational reformers, better signaling of job skills is not an end in itself, but a means of inducing students, parents, teachers, and school boards to place greater priority on learning. It will not be easy, however, to design a system that certifies academic and occupational achievement; attracts employer participation; satisfies federal nondiscrimination requirements; and maximizes student incentives to learn, teacher incentives to set high standards, and parental incentives to demand and pay for a quality education.