The East Asian financial crisis is certain to leave its mark on America’s trade balance. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development projects that over the next two years the broadest measure of the U.S. trade deficit—the current account balance, which includes trade in goods and services, net factor incomes, and unilateral transfers—will grow by some $100 billion dollars. The deficit in goods trade alone will grow to exceed $300 billion. Such projections have been greeted with alarm, especially with last year’s current account deficit of $166 billion already approaching record levels. The growing trade deficits are likely to make it even harder for the Clinton administration to get “fast-track” authority to negotiate further trade liberalization. They could even increase protectionist pressures within the United States.
But the conviction that large trade deficits must be a problem merits a closer look. Efforts to lower the trade deficit by erecting new barriers to the U.S. market could in fact be disastrous. Both the world and the United States could be much better off if the deficit is allowed to grow.
We are all in new territory given the U.S. abdication of leadership on trade liberalization and the Trump's administration [sic] hostility to the multilateral trading system. In rescuing the TPP and finalizing the Free Trade Agreement with the European Union, Japan has delivered mega trade agreements that carry a very different meaning from when the negotiations started. They make a stand in favor of open markets, tariff elimination exercises, and codification of rules at a time when there is grave concern over the direction of the two largest economies in the world.