RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY
Grover J. "Russ" Whitehurst, February 06, 2012, Education Next
Russ Whitehurst argues that a fundamentally new approach to education reform is needed if the government wants to achieve true equity. He proposes to reform the nation’s schools on the basis of two principles that have served the nation exceedingly well throughout its history: federalism and choice. Read More
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY
Grover J. "Russ" Whitehurst, September 23, 2011, The Brookings Institution
Grover J. Whitehurst examines the details of the Obama administration's intention to use waivers to allow states to sidestep the requirements of No Child Left Behind, and argues that this use of standard secretarial waiver authority will prove to be counterproductive and will set a dangerous precedent. Read More
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY
Grover J. "Russ" Whitehurst, August 08, 2011, The Brookings Institution
Grover J. Whitehurst discusses the White House's announcement on No Child Left Behind waivers, arguing that while schools are being over-identified as requiring intervention, the administration is using waivers in an unprecedented manner to rewrite the act. Read More
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY
Grover J. "Russ" Whitehurst, March 24, 2010, The Brookings Institution
The release of the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress reading scores will spur significant discussion about whether No Child Left Behind is working. Brown Center Director Russ Whitehurst writes that the NAEP results, on their own, are not strong indicators of NCLB’s effectiveness. Rather, Whitehurst argues for deeper research to uncover what works and what doesn't. Read More
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY
Diane Ravitch and Ben Wildavsky, March 18, 2010, The New Republic
In a March 2010 education symposium held by The New Republic, Diane Ravitch and Ben Wildavsky argue for and against, respectively, market-based school reform on the bases of school choice and accountability. Ravitch contends that the current education reform "consensus" ignores teachers, whereas Wildavsky claims that Ravitch misunderstands the roles of teacher professionalism, charter schools and bipartisanship in education. Read More
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY
Ben Wildavsky, March 15, 2010, The New Republic
In a review of Diane Ravitch’s The Death and Life of the Great American School System, Ben Wildavsky writes that although Ravitch offers some useful insights into the inadequacies of education reform efforts to date, she ultimately fails to make the case that the central philosophies governing today’s bipartisan reform movement - test-based accountability and school choice - have undermined teaching, learning and content. Read More
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY
Alan Berube, February 2010, The Brookings Institution
In a FY 2011 budget that freezes non-defense discretionary expenditures, the Department of Education has attracted some attention for being one of the few places in the federal government that would attract an increase in funding if the plan is enacted. Read More
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY
Tom Loveless and Michael J. Petrilli , August 28, 2009, The New York Times
According to a recent study, No Child Left Behind is having its intended effect—bettering the performance of low-achieving students—and also raising test scores for top students. However, Tom Loveless and Michael Petrilli find this latter conclusion flawed because state tests are poor measurements for high achieving students; the study’s depicted state trends create a misleading national picture; and the analysis does not compare today’s students with those of earlier eras. Read More
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY
Tom Loveless, February 25, 2009, The Brookings Institution
In the 2008 Brown Center Report on American Education, Tom Loveless closely examines the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), student achievement in the nation's largest urban school districts, and the trend of placing unprepared eighth-graders into algebra and other advanced math classes. Read More
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY
Grover J. "Russ" Whitehurst, February 2009, The Brookings Institution
Former President George W. Bush finished his tenure without having won congressional renewal of his No Child Left Behind (NCLB) policy. With President Barack Obama now at the helm, NCLB is up for debate. Brown Center Director Russ Whitehurst examines Reading First, a key component of NCLB, that aims to ensure that all children learn to read well by the end of third grade. Read More
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY
Tom Loveless, June 18, 2008, The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Tom Loveless offers an analysis on the achievement trends for high-achieving students (defined, like low-achieving students, by their performance on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, or NAEP) since the early 1990s and, in more detail, since 2000. Read More
PAST EVENT
Monday, October 22, 2007
10:00 AM to 11:30 AM
Washington, DC
At an event hosted by the Brown Center on Education Policy, authors of a new volume examined whether No Child Left Behind is enhancing educational opportunities for our most disadvantaged students. Read More
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY
Diane Ravitch, October 03, 2007, The New York Times
Despite the rosy claims of the Bush administration, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002 is fundamentally flawed, says Diane Ravitch. The main goal of the law — that all children in the United States will be proficient in reading and mathematics by 2014 — is simply unattainable. Read More
PAST EVENT
Wednesday, March 28, 2007
9:00 AM to 11:00 AM
Washington, DC
The Brookings Institution and Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson School released the latest volume of The Future of Children journal, "Excellence in the Classroom," discussing options for improving teacher quality. Read More
PAST EVENT
Wednesday, October 18, 2006
10:00 AM to 11:30 AM
Washington, DC
The Brown Center released its 2006 Report on American Education at an event. The report examines whether states are artificially inflating the number of students meeting proficiency standards mandated by the No Child Left Behind Act. Read More