UPCOMING EVENT
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
10:00 AM to 11:30 AM
Washington, DC
The winner of this year’s presidential election will be faced with crafting a foreign policy strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, two countries beset by development, governance, and security challenges as well as a tense relationship with each other. The increasing political influence of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the continued existence of al-Qaeda sanctuaries in volatile border areas, and Pakistan’s nuclear capabilities pose an international security threat that extends beyond south Asia. On February 15, the Campaign 2012 project at Brookings will hold a public discussion on Afghanistan and Pakistan, the second in a series of forums that will identify and address the 12 most critical issues facing the next president. Read More
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY
Marvin Kalb, February 01, 2012, The Brookings Institution
On the 44th anniversary of the Tet Offensive, Marvin Kalb reflects on the Vietnam War and considers its implications on Obama's defense policies, particularly in Afghanistan. Read More
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY
Bruce Riedel, January 30, 2012, The Brookings Institution
Top Republican presidential candidates are calling President Obama's stance on Iran weak and threatening to use force in the region if elected. Bruce Riedel explains why again taking on a second war before finishing in Afghanistan would be a disaster, and could imperil stability in the region. Read More
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY
Marvin Kalb, January 23, 2012, The Brookings Institution
Marvin Kalb assesses several major roadblocks that President Obama is facing in his efforts to conclude the Afghan War. Kalb argues that with a decisive military victory now out of reach, President Obama now must negotiate with the Taliban to create a stable, coalition government, similar to how President Nixon ended the war in Vietnam. Read More
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY
Vanda Felbab-Brown, January 2012, South Asia Journal
Vanda Felbab-Brown assesses the effects of U.S. policies adopted in Afghanistan on the quality of governance there. Felbab-Brown highlights key policy challenges, including widespread ambivalence over fighting corruption. Read More
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY
Vanda Felbab-Brown, January 03, 2012, PBS Frontline
In an interview with PBS Frontline, Vanda Felbab-Brown discusses the widespread effects of opium production in Afghanistan and the outcome of international and domestic efforts to curb it. Read More
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY
Ian Livingston and Michael E. O'Hanlon, December 19, 2011, The New York Times
As U.S. forces withdraw from Iraq, Michael O'Hanlon and Ian Livingston offer a look at gains and challenges in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan in the final "States of Conflict" installment. Read More
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY
Michael E. O'Hanlon and John Nagl, December 07, 2011, POLITICO
Despite negative domestic sentiments relating to the war in Afghanistan, Michael O'Hanlon and John Nagl argue that there is progress. According to the authors, the odds of attaining core U.S. strategic goals are reasonably good if U.S. forces work to build up and support Afghan troops over the next three years. Read More
PAST EVENT
Monday, December 05, 2011
10:00 AM to 11:30 AM
Washington, DC
It is a tenet of international law that states are responsible for protecting the rights of persons within their borders, including the internally displaced. On December 5, 2011, the Brookings-LSE Project on Internal Displacement held a private launch event for its report, From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National Approaches to Internal Displacement, which examines government response to internal displacement in fifteen of the twenty countries most affected by internal displacement due to conflict, generalized violence and human rights violations.
Read More
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY
Bruce Riedel, November 27, 2011, The Daily Beast
America’s relationship with Pakistan is crashing, says Bruce Riedel. In the wake of Saturday's NATO airstrikes, which allegedly led to the death of 24 Pakistani soldiers, Riedel offers perspective on the failing U.S.-Pakistan relationship and explains what this means for U.S. policy in Afghanistan and the region. Read More
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY
Michael E. O'Hanlon, November 21, 2011, POLITICO
Michael O'Hanlon assesses current levels of violence in Afghanistan, arguing that the NATO troop drawdown over the next three years must be handled carefully in order to achieve stability in the region. Read More
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY
Michael E. O'Hanlon, November 16, 2011, The Wall Street Journal
Afghan President Hamid Karzai went to New Delhi last month and signed a long-term security agreement. Michael O’Hanlon argues that if Afghanistan chooses India over Pakistan as a strategic partner in the region, the most probable outcome would be Islamabad waging a full-blown proxy war. Read More
PAST EVENT
Wednesday, November 02, 2011
2:00 PM to 3:30 PM
Washington, DC
The tenth anniversary of the war in Afghanistan is an opportunity to take stock of the humanitarian and development situation in the country. Although today’s headlines are focused on the military transition, there are serious development and governance challenges which need to be addressed to ensure the country's stability and the well-being of its citizens. On November 2, the Brookings-LSE Project on Internal Displacement and Save the Children hosted a discussion on the challenges and opportunities for development during this crucial transition period. Read More
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY
Elizabeth Ferris, Erin Mooney and Chareen Stark, November 01, 2011, The Brookings Institution
It is a tenet of international law that states are responsible for protecting the rights of persons within their borders, including the internally displaced. Elizabeth Ferris, Erin Mooney and Chareen Stark examine government response to internal displacement in fifteen countries affected by internal displacement due to conflict, generalized violence and human rights violations.
Read More
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY
Michael E. O'Hanlon and Paul Wolfowitz, October 28, 2011, Foreign Policy
Michael O'Hanlon and Paul Wolfowitz argue that the Colombia model—which included involvement by the Colombian military and U.S. military advisors, U.S. monetary assistance, and strong national leadership—could be applied to successfully combat drug trafficking and terrorism in Afghanistan. Read More