-
Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:00:00 GMT
While the United States faces budget deficits and economic challenge of a scale not seen in decades, earmarks and wasteful "pork" continue to be built into defense policy bills. Peter Singer explains why, especially during a time of war and economic crisis, this wasteful behavior can hurt defense priorities while funding unneeded projects.
-
Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:00:00 GMT

On Wednesday, October 7, Peter W. Singer and Fred Barbash answered your questions about defense in a high-tech world during a live web chat.
-
Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:30:00 GMT
Event Information:
- October 07, 2009, 12:30 PM to 1:30 PM
New technology and modes of warfare are changing our understanding of national security and defense capabilities. On Wednesday, October 7, Peter W. Singer and Fred Barbash answered questions about defense issues in a high-tech world, including: current U.S. defense needs; defense energy security; and future priorities such as robotic warfare on the ground, in the air and from space.
-
Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:00:00 GMT
Peter Singer believes the issue of energy security has too long been looked at through only the environmental lens. He argues that it is also a national security issue, noting the U.S. military spends roughly $20 billion a year for petroleum alone, that diverts funds which would be better served elsewhere.
-
Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:00:00 GMT

The U.S. Department of Defense is the world’s single largest consumer of energy, using more resources than 100 nations. Peter Singer and Jerry Warner analyze what can be done to better manage defense energy security by implementing steps to increase energy efficiency and substituting alternative forms of energy to meet the military’s fuel needs.
-
Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:00:00 GMT
Peter Singer writes that the United States is a nation of thinking big, but he cautions against continuing to translate this interest to national security and defense policy. Singer believes the Pentagon should encourage more competition to create leaner, cheaper and less time-draining weapons systems and vehicles.
-
Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:00:00 GMT
The Obama administration recently announced a defense budget that accounts for nearly zero real growth in the "base budget" over the next five years. Michael O’Hanlon explores the shortfalls of this plan and points to the lack of viability of the proposed budget. O'Hanlon outlines critical changes that must be made in order to best guarantee U.S. national security objectives.
-
Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:00:00 GMT
A central critique of the Obama administration’s new defense budget proposal is that it underfunds missile defense systems. Given how far the systems have progressed over the years, Michael O'Hanlon argues the critique is overblown and examines the relatively minor cuts to the program.
-
Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:00:00 GMT
Michael O'Hanlon explores defense spending in Afghanistan, Iraq and other locations in the world where U.S. military personnel are based. O'Hanlon finds that changes planned by the Obama administration will save large amounts of money over the coming years, but he cautions that politics of defense will continue to make it difficult to deny funding which supports troops in the field.
-
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:00:00 GMT

These are extraordinary times in American national security policy. The nation remains involved in two of the longest conflicts of its history in Iraq and Afghanistan, with more than 4,000 lives lost over six years in Iraq and more than 600 lost over nearly eight years in Afghanistan. In this Foreign Policy Working paper Michael O'Hanlon examines the multi-facted "hard power" budget options moving forward.
-
Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:00:00 GMT

As U.S. armed forces continue their heroic operations around the globe, worries have intensified about sustaining adequate defense funding in the future. Michael O'Hanlon agues that a 4 percent gross domestic product floor for defense spending is unnecessary, because needs will fluctuate and there should not be a law preventing lower spending in the future if the geopolitical environment allows.
-
Tue, 11 Dec 2007 00:00:00 GMT
Efforts to pass a massive compromise federal spending bill collapsed Monday. Brookings senior fellow Thomas E. Mann appeared on The Diane Rehm show with Brian Riedl of the Heritage Foundation and Philip Joyce of George Washington University to discuss federal budget battles.
-
Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:00:00 GMT
In "The Rewards of Hiring Veterans," Michael O'Hanlon and Thomas Lynch discuss benefits, challenges, and acquired skills of U.S. servicemen returning from Iraq. They assert that serving the U.S. military provides many advantages for servicemen such as informational technology skills, leadership skills, foreign language training, and a greater understanding of international partners and environments. They, however, believe that the U.S. Government must do a better job of providing veterans benefits, such as career placement, health services, and temporary subsidies.
-
Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:00:00 GMT

Defense#Defense budget and appropriations
-
Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:00:00 GMT
Interview by Thomas E. Mann, NPR's All Things Considered (3/23/07)
-
Mon, 01 Jan 2007 00:00:00 GMT
How can we balance the budget in the next five years? In a series of papers on budget choices, Brookings analysts examine options for reducing domestic discretionary spending, pruning the defense budget, raising revenues, and investing additional resources in children. An overall deficit reduction plan uses the ideas developed in this series to balance the budget in the next five years. All five papers in this series, and more information about the Budgeting for National Priorities project, can be found at www.brookings.edu/budget.
-
Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:00:00 GMT
Since its publication Feb. 3, the Pentagon's Quadrennial Defense Review has been severely criticized by commentators ranging from The Washington Post's editorial board to former Bush administration officials and neocons to moderates and progressives.
-
Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:00:00 GMT

The war on terror and the ongoing operations in Iraq and Afghanistan have forced upon this country soaring defense budgets and unprecedented challenges in policymaking. In this new volume, leading foreign policy expert Michael OHanlon offers policy
-
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Michael E. O'Hanlon, Baltimore Sun (1/11/05)
-
Wed, 01 Dec 2004 00:00:00 GMT

In recent years security has taken a prominent place on the political and corporate agendas. The result has been the emergence of a $100 billion market for security goods and services, fed by growing demand from governments, businesses, and private h
-
Tue, 05 Oct 2004 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Paul C. Light, The Washington Post (10/5/04)
-
Thu, 09 Sep 2004 00:00:00 GMT
Letter to the Editor by Michael E. O'Hanlon, Washington Times (9/9/04)
-
Tue, 18 May 2004 00:00:00 GMT
Event summary of the briefing on exploring and debating a number of possible options to help address these fiscal challenges before it is too late. (5/18/04)
-
Tue, 18 May 2004 08:45:00 GMT
Event Information:
- May 18, 2004, 8:45 AM to 11:30 AM
-
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Lael Brainard, Michael E. O'Hanlon and Isabel V. Sawhill, The Albany Times-Union (2/23/04)
-
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:30:00 GMT
Event Information:
- January 13, 2004, 3:30 PM to 5:30 PM
-
Sat, 01 Nov 2003 00:00:00 GMT
Article by Michael O'Hanlon, Foreign Affairs (November/December 2003)
-
Wed, 06 Aug 2003 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Lael Brainard and Michael E. O'Hanlon, Financial Times (8/6/03)
-
Thu, 15 May 2003 00:00:00 GMT
Letter to the Editor, The Washington Times (5/15/03)
-
Wed, 12 Feb 2003 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Ivo Daalder, Michael O'Hanlon and Peter Orszag, Senior Fellows, the Brookings Institution, in The Baltimore Sun
-
Mon, 06 Jan 2003 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Michael O'Hanlon, Senior Fellow, the Brookings Institution, in The Washington Post, January 6, 2003
-
Sun, 01 Dec 2002 00:00:00 GMT
Article by Michael E. O'Hanlon, Senior Fellow, and Aaron Moburg Jones, Research Assistant, the Brookings Institution, in the New Economy, December 2002
-
Tue, 05 Nov 2002 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Michael O'Hanlon, Senior Fellow, the Brookings Institution, in The Japan Times, November 5, 2002
-
Thu, 01 Aug 2002 00:00:00 GMT

This updated edition incorporates lessons from the war in Afghanistan, other developments since September 11, and a critical assessment of the Bush administration's defense strategy and budget plan, both of which were formulated and publicly unveiled
-
Sat, 01 Jun 2002 00:00:00 GMT
Brookings Review article by John Spratt and Hugh Brady (Summer 2002)
-
Sun, 26 May 2002 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Michael O'Hanlon, Senior Fellow, the Brookings Institution, in the San Diego Union-Tribune, May 26, 2002
-
Thu, 09 May 2002 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Michael O'Hanlon, Senior Fellow, the Brookings Institution
-
Sun, 03 Mar 2002 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Michael O'Hanlon, Senior Fellow, the Brookings Institution, in The Japan Times, March 3, 2002
-
Fri, 01 Mar 2002 00:00:00 GMT
Policy Brief #95, by Michael O'Hanlon (March 2002)
-
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 00:00:00 GMT
Testimony before the U.S. Senate Budget Committee, by Michael O'Hanlon, Foreign Policy Studies, the Brookings Institution, February 28, 2002
-
Sun, 10 Feb 2002 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Michael O'Hanlon, Senior Fellow, The Brookings Institution, in the San Jose Mercury News, February 10, 2002
-
Tue, 05 Feb 2002 00:00:00 GMT
Interview with Thomas Mann, Senior Fellow, the Brookings Institution, on The Diane Rehm Show
-
Sun, 03 Feb 2002 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Ivo H. Daalder and James M. Lindsay, Senior Fellows, The Brookings Institution, in the San Jose Mercury News, February 3, 2002
-
Mon, 28 Jan 2002 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Michael O'Hanlon, Senior Fellow, the Brookings Institution, in the Los Angeles Times, January 28, 2002
-
Thu, 17 Jan 2002 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Ivo Daalder and James Lindsay, Senior Fellows, the Brookings Institution, in The Baltimore Sun, January 17, 2002
-
Tue, 18 Dec 2001 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by P.W. Singer, Olin Fellow, The Brookings Institution, in Defense News, December 17-23, 2001
-
Sat, 27 Oct 2001 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Henry J. Aaron, Senior Fellow, The Brookings Institution, in The Boston Globe, October 27, 2001
-
Tue, 31 Jul 2001 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Michael O'Hanlon, Senior Fellow, the Brookings Institution, in the Financial Times, July 31, 2001
-
Thu, 26 Jul 2001 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Michael O'Hanlon, Senior Fellow, the Brookings Institution, in The Baltimore Sun, July 26, 2001
-
Wed, 18 Jul 2001 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Michael O'Hanlon, Senior Fellow, the Brookings Institution, in USA Today, July 18, 2001
-
Wed, 27 Jun 2001 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Michael O'Hanlon, Senior Fellow, the Brookings Institution, in The New York Times, June 27, 2001
-
Thu, 15 Mar 2001 00:00:00 GMT

This latest study in the Brookings series on U.S. defense strategy and the defense budget reviews current American military capabilities and offers suggestions for the new administration and Congress.
-
Sat, 03 Mar 2001 00:00:00 GMT
Irresponsible Budget, Opinion in The Christian Science Monitor, March 2, 2001, by Michael O'Hanlon
-
Thu, 08 Feb 2001 00:00:00 GMT
Not Raising the Defense Budget Is Indefensible, Opinion in The Wall Street Journal, February 8, 2001, by Michael O'Hanlon
-
Mon, 09 Oct 2000 00:00:00 GMT
olving Today's Defense Dilemma, Opinion in Defense News, October 9, 2000, by Michael E. O'Hanlon, Senior Fellow, foreign-policy, The Brookings Institution
-
Mon, 25 Sep 2000 00:00:00 GMT
How Much Money Is Enough for Defense? Opinion in the Los Angeles Times, September 25, 2000, by Michael E. O'Hanlon, Senior Fellow, foreign-policy, The Brookings Institution.
-
Mon, 11 Sep 2000 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Ivo H. Daalder and Michael E. O'Hanlon in The Baltimore Sun (9/11/00)
-
Wed, 01 Mar 2000 00:00:00 GMT
-
Wed, 01 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
-
Wed, 01 Sep 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Policy Brief #53, by Michael E. O'Hanlon (September 1999)
-
Fri, 15 Jan 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Policy Brief #43, by Michael E. O'Hanlon (January 1999)
-
Mon, 14 Dec 1998 00:00:00 GMT
Spare a Dime for the Pentagon, Los Angeles Times, December 17, 1998, by Michael O'Hanlon. ""Military: No big defense spending increase is needed. But the balanced-budget deal's furhter cuts would go too far.
-
Tue, 29 Jul 1997 00:00:00 GMT
Testimony by Michael E. O'Hanlon, Subcommittee on Military Personnel, House National Security Committee (7/29/97)
-
Mon, 21 Apr 1997 00:00:00 GMT

In this book, O'Hanlon and Graham focus on the U.S.'s international spending, primarily on foreign assistance; placing official development assistance in a broad historical, international, and economic perspective.
-
Tue, 01 Apr 1997 00:00:00 GMT
Policy Brief #15, by Michael E. O'Hanlon (April 1997)
-
Sat, 01 Mar 1997 00:00:00 GMT
Brookings Review article by Mickey Edwards and Stephen J. Solarz (Spring 1997)
-
Tue, 14 Jan 1997 00:00:00 GMT
On Weapons Spending, The New York Times, January 14, 1997, by Stephen I. Schwartz. A letter to the editor. Current U.S. spending for nuclear weapons is much more than four percent of the defense budget.
-
Wed, 25 Sep 1996 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Jonathan Rauch, Guest Scholar, The Brookings Institution
-
Sun, 01 Sep 1996 00:00:00 GMT
Brookings Review article by John Steinbruner (Fall 1996)
-
Sat, 01 Jun 1996 00:00:00 GMT
Brookings Review, Summer 1996
-
Sat, 01 Jun 1996 00:00:00 GMT
Brookings Review, Summer 1996