-
Sat, 15 Aug 2009 00:00:00 GMT

Which Path to Persia? objectively presents the most important policy options available to the United States in crafting a new strategy toward Iran.
-
Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:00:00 GMT
In the post-9/11 era, the United States is grappling with many ethical, operational and political questions regarding the targeted killings of terrorists. Dan Byman argues that such strikes are a painful necessity in a time when U.S. foes cannot be found or fought onconventional battlefields.
-
Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:00:00 GMT

CIA Director Leon Panetta has cancelled a secret CIA plan to train anti-terrorist assassins, but Daniel Byman notes that strikes by U.S. military drones have had mixed success as a tactic for combating al Qaeda in Pakistan. Given the humanitarian and political risks, each strike needs to be carefully weighed. But equally important is the risk of not striking—and inadvertently allowing al Qaeda leaders free reign to plot terrorist mayhem.
-
Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:00:00 GMT

In a new Saban Analysis Paper, six Brookings experts analyze the main policy approaches toward Iran. In examining the benefits and drawbacks of the nine options—including engagement, persuasion, airstrikes, and containment—the authors refrain from recommending one policy over the other. Rather, they present the details of the policies in a manner that allows readers to understand the complexity of the challenge that is Iran and decide for themselves which group of policies is best.
-
Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:00:00 GMT
Daniel Byman explores the massive demonstrations that have swept parts of Iran since the election on June 12 and what they might mean for the clerical regime. He argues that while there is reason to believe there is growing interest in reform in the country, this period of unrest is fairly unlikely to bring it.
-
Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:00:00 GMT

Daniel Byman writes that talking with insurgents is often a necessary first step toward defeating them or reaching an acceptable compromise. Pointing to successes in Iraq and elsewhere, Byman addresses the costs and advantages of talking with insurgents to draw conclusions about how lessons learned may be applied to Afghanistan.
-
Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:00:00 GMT
Terrorism analysts repeatedly warned that al-Qaeda might strike in the days leading up to the election, but November 4th came and went without incident. Daniel Byman explains why the U.S. did not witness any acts of terrorism in the run-up to this years election.
-
Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:00:00 GMT
Daniel Byman examines whether the outbreak of an insurgency after the U.S. invasion of Iraq was an avoidable policy failure or whether the structural conditions surrounding the occupation made such an outbreak inevitable.
-
Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:00:00 GMT
Think that state sponsors of terror are pulling all the strings? Think again. Daniel Byman details how countries like Iran and Syria may play a big role in the terrorism underworld, but they’re quickly losing control over rogues that bite the hands that once fed them.
-
Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:00:00 GMT
Daniel Byman notes that while al-Qaeda remains powerful, "it faces challenges on almost every front." From being denounced by once-friendly preachers to the serious setbacks for al-Qaeda in Iraq, the terror organization finds itself struggling to reach the goals it once believed were close at hand.
-
Mon, 11 Aug 2008 00:00:00 GMT
Daniel Byman assesses the "bloody successes" of al-Qaeda, from their inception through the present day. Byman argues that much of the credit should go to Osama Bin Laden for his leaderhip skills and also to the group's ability to transform itself to fit changing political and security environments.
-
Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:00:00 GMT

Daniel Byman and Kenneth Pollack argue that the problems facing Iraq could have tremendous consequences for the broader "war on terror," particularly if problems return to or exceed levels seen at the height of violence in 2006. Byman and Pollack write that Salafi militants may use the country as a base for operations or attacks elsewhere in the region and that refugees from Iraq might spread terrorism, radicalize neighboring populations, and contribute to instability throughout the region.
-
Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:00:00 GMT
Daniel Byman submitted recommendations to the Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism for improving the United States government’s ability to conceptualize, organize for, and counter the threat of terrorists acquiring and using WMD.
-
Thu, 29 May 2008 00:00:00 GMT
The current United States approach to state sponsorship of terrorism is flawed, writes Daniel Byman. He suggests that instead of simply managing a list of state sponsors, Washington needs to recognize the complexity of sponsorship, monitor states using a broad definition of what constitutes state sponsorship, and use diplomatic pressure as well as political and economic penalties when needed.
-
Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:00 GMT
Daniel Byman believes the U.S. Department of State’s list of state sponsors of terrorism needs to be overhauled and updated. He notes that many of the most threatening states are those that are passive or nonaggressive, and that the costs of inaction often harm the sponsor as well as other states.
-
Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:00:00 GMT
Daniel Byman traveled to Israel and Jordan in March—a time of crisis in the Middle East. During Byman’s trip, Palestinian militants in the Gaza Strip fired rockets against the Israeli cities of Sderot and Ashkelon, an attack occurred in the Mercaz Harav Yeshiva in Jerusalem, and Israel took retaliatory measures in the Gaza Strip. In both Israel and Jordan, Byman found that the predominant mood was one of frustration and gloom. Israelis felt trapped between their sense that inaction would encourage more violence and their recognition that the military and political options looked unpromising. Jordanians fretted that the Israeli reaction to the violence would strengthen the radicals politically.
-
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:00:00 GMT

Daniel Byman assesses Iran’s past and current use of terrorism as well as the threat of proxy groups using weapons of mass destruction at the request of the country's leaders. He concludes by offering recommendations for decreasing Iran’s support of terrorist organizations.
-
Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:00:00 GMT

In testimony before the Subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Dan Byman states that "to succeed in the long-term, counterterrorism policies must be politically viable for decades." He offers ideas for policy implementations now that can bring consensus and harbor well-informed debate on the issues at hand.
-
Tue, 11 Dec 2007 00:00:00 GMT
Dan Byman asserts that current and past U.S. military soldiers deserve more educational support and funding from our government than they currently receive. Byman also discusses the enormous benefits educational funding would have for not only soldiers, but also civilians, adminstrators, and society as a whole.
-
Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:00:00 GMT

Daniel Byman argues that preventing the Iraqi refugee crisis from further destabilizing the region is the right thing for Iraq and in the best interest of the U.S. He writes "the United States should accept tens of thousands of refugees and must encourage other major powers to do the same."
-
Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:00:00 GMT
Daniel Byman discusses the U.S.'s rendition process. Byman asserts that renditions are an effective means of fighting terrorism and possibly in obtaining terrorist information, but that the policy must be modified to ensure fair treatment of apprehended individuals and due process of law.
-
Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:00:00 GMT
Daniel L. Byman states that “unlike his father and predecessor, Hafez, Bashar is a gambler. And he is rolling the dice in Iraq, in Lebanon, with Israel, and most dangerously at home in Syria.”
-
Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:00:00 GMT
Daniel L. Byman argues that “Tehran's abuse of Esfandiari and other scholars casts a pall on many people's plans to travel to Iran for research.”
-
Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:00:00 GMT
Daniel L. Byman argues that a GAO report and other critiques of the Department of Homeland Security miss the broader problem: The U.S. government has not taken a strategic approach toward homeland security.
-
Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:00:00 GMT
Testimony by Daniel L. Byman before the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations (7/26/07)
-
Wed, 18 Jul 2007 00:00:00 GMT
Testimony by Daniel L. Byman before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the House Armed Services Committee (7/18/07)
-
Sun, 01 Jul 2007 00:00:00 GMT
"Iraq and the Global War on Terrorism," by Daniel Byman discusses current and future U.S. strategies for both the Iraqi War and the War on Terrorism.
-
Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:00:00 GMT

Preventing spillover of the Iraqi conflict into neighboring states must be a top priority. In explaining how that can be accomplished, Daniel Byman and Kenneth Pollack draw on their own considerable expertise as well as relevant precedents.
-
Sun, 06 May 2007 00:00:00 GMT
Article by Daniel L. Byman, The Washington Post (5/6/07)
-
Tue, 01 May 2007 00:00:00 GMT
Article by Daniel Byman and Kenneth Pollack, The National Interest (May-June 2007)
-
Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:00:00 GMT
Article by Daniel L. Byman, Slate (3/15/07)
-
Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:00:00 GMT
Testimony by Daniel L. Byman House Committee on Foreign Affairs | Subcommittee on Terrorism, Nonproliferation, and Trade & Subcommittee on the Middle East and South Asia (3/15/07)
-
Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:00:00 GMT
Article by Daniel L. Byman, Foreign Policy (March-April 2007)
-
Sun, 18 Feb 2007 00:00:00 GMT
Article by Daniel L. Byman, The Washington Post (2/19/07)
-
Thu, 08 Feb 2007 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Daniel L. Byman, Salon (2/8/07)
-
Mon, 01 Jan 2007 00:00:00 GMT
Kenneth M. Pollack and Daniel L. Byman propose a set of policy options that the United States could employ to try to contain the "spill over" effects of a full-scale Iraqi civil war.
-
Sun, 03 Dec 2006 00:00:00 GMT
Article by Daniel L. Byman, The Washington Post (12/3/06)
-
Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:00:00 GMT
Article by Daniel L. Byman and Kenneth M. Pollack, The Atlantic Monthly (November 2006)
-
Sun, 01 Oct 2006 00:00:00 GMT
Article by Daniel L. Byman, The Journal of Strategic Studies (October 2006)
-
Fri, 01 Sep 2006 00:00:00 GMT
Article by Jeremy Shapiro and Daniel L. Byman, The Washington Quarterly (Autumn 2006)
-
Fri, 01 Sep 2006 00:00:00 GMT
Article by Kenneth M. Pollack and Daniel L. Byman, Berlin Journal (Fall 2006)
-
Fri, 01 Sep 2006 00:00:00 GMT
Article by Daniel L. Byman, International Security (Fall 2006)
-
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:00:00 GMT
Internet Chat with Daniel L. Byman, Washingtonpost.com (8/21/06)
-
Sun, 20 Aug 2006 00:00:00 GMT
Article by Kenneth M. Pollack and Daniel L. Byman, The Washington Post (8/20/06)
-
Sun, 30 Jul 2006 00:00:00 GMT
Book Review by Daniel L. Byman, Washington Post (7/30/06)
-
Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Daniel L. Byman, Slate (7/26/06)
-
Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Daniel L. Byman, Slate (7/19/06)
-
Sat, 01 Jul 2006 00:00:00 GMT
Article by Daniel L. Byman, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism (July-August 2006)
-
Thu, 08 Jun 2006 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Daniel L. Byman, Slate (6/8/06)
-
Sat, 01 Apr 2006 00:00:00 GMT
Article by Daniel L. Byman; Foreign Affairs (March/April 2006)
-
Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:00:00 GMT
Following the September 11 terrorist attacks, the United States began its war against terrorism. Suddenly, U.S. policymakers had to confront a daunting and often controversial array of counterterrorism issues. These ranged from the types of defense needed to protect the U.S. homeland from terrorist attacks to the use and scope of targeted killings of terrorist leaders abroad. Many aspects of U.S. counterterrorism policy have attracted strong criticism. Some have challenged the effectiveness of U.S. policy. Other critics have blasted the Bush Administration for failing to protect civil liberties.
-
Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Daniel L. Byman, Los Angeles Times (1/20/06)
-
Tue, 01 Nov 2005 00:00:00 GMT
Paper by Daniel L. Byman, Strategic Studies Institute (November 2005)
-
Wed, 01 Jun 2005 00:00:00 GMT
Article by Daniel Byman, The Washington Quarterly (Summer 2005)
-
Fri, 20 May 2005 00:00:00 GMT
Article by Daniel L. Byman, The Chronicle of Higher Education (5/20/05)
-
Sun, 17 Apr 2005 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Daniel Byman, The Washington Post (4/17/05)
-
Tue, 22 Mar 2005 00:00:00 GMT
Article by Daniel L. Byman, Survival (Spring 2005)
-
Tue, 01 Mar 2005 00:00:00 GMT
Book Review by Daniel Byman, The National Interest (3/17/05)
-
Tue, 01 Mar 2005 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Daniel Byman, foreignpolicy.com (3/1/05)
-
Tue, 01 Feb 2005 00:00:00 GMT
Analysis by Daniel L. Byman (2/1/05)
-
Sat, 01 Jan 2005 00:00:00 GMT
Article by Daniel L. Byman, Survival (Winter 2005/2006)
-
Mon, 02 Aug 2004 00:00:00 GMT
Article by Daniel L. Byman, Slate (8/2/04)
-
Tue, 01 Jun 2004 00:00:00 GMT
Article by Daniel L. Byman, The National Interest (Summer 2004)
-
Sat, 01 Nov 2003 00:00:00 GMT
Article by Daniel Byman, Foreign Affairs (November/December 2003)
-
Sun, 01 Jun 2003 00:00:00 GMT
Article by Daniel L. Byman, Survival (Summer 2003)
-
Tue, 27 May 2003 00:00:00 GMT
Opinion by Daniel Byman, The Financial Times (5/27/03)
-
Fri, 23 May 2003 00:00:00 GMT
Paper by Daniel Byman, Middle East Memo (5/23/03)
-
Thu, 10 Apr 2003 00:00:00 GMT
Opinon by Daniel Byman in the San Diego Union-Tribune (April 10, 2003)
-
Mon, 31 Mar 2003 00:00:00 GMT
Testimony by Daniel Byman to the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States (3/31/03)
-
Mon, 03 Mar 2003 00:00:00 GMT
Iraq Memo #12 by Daniel Byman (March 3, 2003)