SERIES: Brookings Cafeteria Podcast | Number 8 of 25 « Previous | Next »

Congressional Master Class: The Senate Filibuster, Congress and the Federal Reserve

Senator Henry Clay speaking about the Compromise of 1850 in the Old Senate Chamber. Daniel Webster is seated to the left of Clay and John C. Calhoun to the left of the Speaker's chairIn this podcast, congressional expert Sarah Binder explains why the Senate filibuster is a historical mistake. She talks about her research on Congress’s relationship with the Federal Reserve and addresses whether Congress is more polarized today than it has been in the past. Binder, a senior fellow in Governance Studies, is also a professor of political science at George Washington University and contributor to the Monkey Cage blog

For further reading:

• The Federal Reserve: Balancing Multiple Mandates (testimony by Alice Rivlin)
Boom! What the Senate Will Be Like When the Nuclear Dust Settles
Beyond the Horse Race to Lead the Fed
Droning on: Thoughts on the Rand Paul “Talking Filibuster”
• Advice and Dissent: The Struggle to Shape the Federal Judiciary
The History of the Filibuster

* In the image, Senator Henry Clay speaks about the Compromise of 1850 in the Old Senate Chamber. Daniel Webster is seated to the left of Clay and John C. Calhoun to the left of the Speaker's chair. (engraving by Robert Whitechurch, ca. 1880, Library of Congress)

SERIES: Brookings Cafeteria Podcast | Number 8