Saturday February 11, 2012

Welcome   |   Register   |   Log in

Past Event

A BROWN CENTER ON EDUCATION POLICY EVENT

Expanding Meaningful School Choice and Competition

School Choice, Education, Children & Families, Opportunity and Well-being

Event Summary

Education choice exercises a powerful pull on parents of school children. Twenty-four percent of parents moved to their current neighborhood so their children could attend their current school; 15 percent of public school students attend parent-selected rather than district-assigned schools; and parents choose private schools or homeschooling for 14 percent of students. Despite its prevalence, school choice remains hotly debated among education policymakers.

Event Information

When

Tuesday, February 02, 2010
10:30 AM to 12:30 PM

Where

Falk Auditorium
The Brookings Institution
1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Washington, DC
Map

Event Materials


Contact: Brookings Office of Communications

Email: events@brookings.edu

Phone: 202.797.6105


On February 2, the Brown Center on Education Policy at Brookings and a task force composed of leading education policy experts released proposals on how to expand school choice to increase equity and create a market within the public sector for school quality. The first of a series of Brown Center reports on rethinking the federal role in education, Expanding Choice in Elementary and Secondary Education, argues that parents should be afforded the maximum degree of choice. It provides a series of practical and novel recommendations for reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, including national chartering of virtual education providers; expanding the types of information collected on school performance; providing incentives for low-performing school districts to increase choice and competition; and creating independent school choice portals to aid parents in choosing between schools.

After the program, the panelists took audience questions.

Transcript

RUSS WHITEHURST: This is the first of four reports that are coming from a project here at Brookings called Rethinking the Federal Role in Education. The task set for each of the task groups including this one was to generate recommendations for policy that were, A, grounded in evidence; B, novel and not beaten to death already in the policy community; and C, having some prospect of action or enactment. So we wanted to operate in an area that was informed by evidence where we could say something that might generate attention and where we could foresee at least in your imaginings that Congress of the administration would view the proposals as feasible or at least worth talking about.

We began the task on choice and competition by thinking in the abstract what's necessary for a good choice system to work. We identified four components that we thought would be present in any market-based system. The first is the presence of choice or choosers. If you get assigned by the government the car we will drive, then we don't need to talk about choice in the automotive industry. There is none. So we need the ability of people to choose. Second, we need information on the basis of which that choice can be made. I'll stick with the car analogy for a moment. We know that Toyota's sales are going to be down because the market is flooded with information about sticking accelerators so that you need information on which choice can be made. Third, and I think will be one of the important and relatively unique aspects of our report, we think that information alone does not produce rational behavior, that you can be flooded with information and still make what seem to be irrational choices. So we think the way information is delivered will be extremely important in determining how choices are made and how rational those choices seem to be in the long-run.

Then finally, there need to be consequences in the system. Again, if you are assigned by the government to drive a Toyota, the sticking accelerator makes no difference at all, you'll still be driving a Toyota tomorrow, but the fact that Ford can jump on this situation and try to increase its sales is part of the competitive matrix that makes the system work. So we will move down this path and I think we'll introduce some interesting recommendations for you in terms of expanding choice. We're going to talk about the national chartering of virtual education providers. I don't think that's been talked about before.

Participants

Introductory Remarks and Moderator

Grover J. "Russ" Whitehurst

Director, Brown Center on Education Policy

Panelists

Jay Greene

Head of the Department of Education Reform, University of Arkansas

Tom Loveless

Senior Fellow, Governance Studies

W. Bentley MacLeod

Professor, Columbia University

Thomas Nechyba

Professor, Duke University

Paul Peterson

Henry Lee Shattuck Professor of Government, Director of the Program on Education Policy and Governance, Harvard University

Meredith Rosenthal

Associate Professor of Health Economics and Policy, Harvard School of Public Health


My Portfolio

My New Content

View suggested content based on items you have saved to your Portfolio.
Log in or register now