Quality. Independence. Impact.

Home | Contact Us | Media Resources

Sunday November 8, 2009

Welcome   |   Register   |   Log in


Event Summary

The two Iraq wars in 1991 and 2003 represent milestones in American military intervention abroad. They reflect the influences of the two dominant and competing schools of American foreign policy. The first represents a more traditionalist school, often described as "realist," while the latter reflects a "neoconservative" belief that the United States’ principal foreign policy objective is to influence the nature of states and conditions within them, both for moral and ideological reasons.

Event Information

When

Monday, June 01, 2009
2:00 PM to 3:30 PM

Where

Falk Auditorium
The Brookings Institution
1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Washington, DC
Map

Contact: Brookings Office of Communications

E-mail: events@brookings.edu

Phone: 202.797.6105

On June 1, the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at Brookings will host Richard N. Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations, for a discussion of his new book War of Necessity, War of Choice (Simon & Schuster, May 2009), as well as the implications of these two wars for future American military interventions in the Middle East. Haass previously served as senior director for Near East and South Asian affairs on the staff of the National Security Council under President George H. W. Bush and as the director of policy planning at the Department of State under President George W. Bush. He will draw on his unique experience as one of a handful of top government officials involved in the decision-making process during both Iraq conflicts.

Haass will be joined by Senior Fellow Kenneth M. Pollack, director of research at the Saban Center and author of A Switch in Time: A New Strategy for America in Iraq (Brookings Institution Press, 2006) and Things Fall Apart, Containing the Spillover from an Iraqi Civil War (Brookings Institution Press, 2007). Brookings Senior Fellow and Saban Center Director Martin Indyk provide introductory remarks and moderate the discussion. After the program, panelists will take audience questions.

Transcript

RICHARD HAAS: What I find so interesting about all this, and, in part, what led me to write the book, is not simply that I was lucky or at times unlucky enough to be involved in all this close-up. Just the kind of parallelism -- I mean who would have thought 20 years ago, when the Wall came down, that the two or two of the defining events of the Cold War era would be two wars between a guy named Bush and a guy named Saddam Hussein. Not a lot of people would have bet a lot of money on those things. So it’s just one of those, you know, curiosities that’s hard to resist. But also that in these two wars, to me, encapsulated the principal fault line of the American foreign policy debate. And by that I mean, when you take a step back, so much of American foreign policy, the dispute or the debate about our role in the world, is really over what it is we’re setting out to do, what we should set out to do.

And there’s one school of thought that talks about – that the principal business or focus of American foreign policy ought to be on the foreign policy of others, limited goals, adjustment and so forth, and this is very much the foreign policy of the 41st president, traditionally described or characterized or caricatured as realism, as opposed to the foreign policy of others, which essentially says the principal purpose of foreign policy is to change the domestic and internal nature of others, be it for moral reasons or also for reasons that mature democracies tend to make, tend to treat their neighbors better.

That may all be well and good, except it’s hard to bring about mature democracies, in the mean time, we have a foreign policy to conduct with many countries that are anything but mature democracies. And this is very much the policy of a Woodrow Wilson, and to some extent, became the foreign policy of George W. Bush. And in looking at the two Iraq wars, what you have is a good example, to me, of case studies that reflect this long standing debate with – over really the principal or correct purpose of American foreign policy. So I go to case studies; I think there’s lessons for the future about when and how to wage wars of choice in particular, about preventive and preemptive wars.

Participants

Introduction and Moderator

Martin S. Indyk

Director, Saban Center for Middle East Policy

Panelists

Richard N. Haass

President, Council on Foreign Relations

Kenneth M. Pollack

Director of Research , Saban Center for Middle East Policy


My Portfolio

My New Content

View suggested content based on items you have saved to your Portfolio.
Log in or register now