Quality. Independence. Impact.

Home | Contact Us | Media Resources

Sunday November 22, 2009

Welcome   |   Register   |   Log in

Past Event

A Governance Studies and Opportunity 08: Independent Ideas for Our Next President Event

Opportunity 08: Political Parties and Partisanship: The American Electorate in 2008

Elections, Political Campaigns, Politics


Event Summary

It is commonplace to observe that this is an era of sharply polarized political parties. But what does this mean for the 2008 elections? Have Democrats built a significant advantage in underlying partisan attachments, ending an extended period of rough parity between the parties? How important is party identification in presidential and congressional elections? Have changes in partisanship altered the electoral map? How numerous are independents and swing voters? On September 12, the Brookings Institution’s Opportunity 08 project, in partnership with the Center for the Study of Democratic Politics at Princeton University’s Woodrow Wilson School of Public Affairs, hosted the first of four roundtable discussions which will examine these and other key questions about American electoral politics and their connection with the 2008 campaign.

Event Information

When

Friday, September 12, 2008
10:00 AM to 11:30 AM

Where

Saul/Zilkha Rooms
The Brookings Institution
1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Washington, DC
Map

Event Materials

Contact: Brookings Office of Communications

E-mail: events@brookings.edu

Phone: 202.797.6105

The event featured panelists Alan Abramowitz of Emory University, John Aldrich of Duke University, and E.J. Dionne, Jr. of Brookings. Larry Bartels of Princeton and Thomas Mann of Brookings moderated the discussion, which explored the current partisan landscape in the United States and how partisanship is likely to affect the outcome of the presidential contest.

After initial presentations, panelists took audience questions.

Event Materials:

View handout from Alan Abramowitz »
View handout from Larry Bartels »

Opportunity 08 aims to help presidential candidates and the public focus on critical issues facing the nation, providing ideas, policy forums and information on a broad range of domestic and foreign policy questions. The Center for the Study of Democratic Politics supports empirical research on democratic political processes and institutions; its aim is to encourage rigorous social scientific analysis that informs and is informed by normative theories of democracy.

Upcoming Events: Assessing Election Factors
As the presidential campaign comes down to its final weeks, Brookings and Princeton University will hold a series of Opportunity 08 events examining critical factors that could determine the outcome with Brookings scholar and presidential elections expert Thomas Mann.

  • September 26: a look at how Bush's legacy on the economy and the Iraq war are playing out in the contest.
  • October 17: an analysis of the candidates' ideology and image as well as the role of race in the campaign.
  • October 31: an examination of how money, advertising and voter mobilization efforts are shaping up in the final, decisive week.

Transcript

TOM MANN: We all know that contemporary American politics is characterized by a sharp ideological polarization between our two major political parties who have been operating in recent years in a position of rough parody. You will see that in some of the documents of the long-time democratic advantage being completely neutralized, and in the last presidential election the two parties had almost exact parity, roughly 49 percent each of partisans and independent leaners. So the question is, how do we arrive at that point? What changed in our politics to bring us to this?

And next question, is the relative number of Democrats and Republicans in the electorate this positive in any way of presidential election outcomes? It’s one thing for party ID to be a strong predictor of individual votes, but election outcomes are decided at the margin. And how and in what ways is partisanship relevant to the decisive margin? We know that in past eras in the ‘50s and ‘60s, a huge Democratic advantage in party ID could not prevent Republican landslides in presidential elections, but have things changed and does a significant advantage matter now? And is there such a significant advantage? Have we moved off parity to a position of Democratic advantage? How durable are the changes that we’ve witnessed in the last couple of years? Can they be overcome by one good party convention? How stable or ephemeral are these measures of partisan identification?

Finally, if the country has become more partisan, why are both candidates promising to rise above parties and partisanship? What’s going on here? What is the logic of campaign strategies that lead both candidates to emphasize a world that doesn’t seem to exist now?

Participants

Panelists

Alan Abramowitz

Alben W. Barkley Professor of Political Science, Emory University

John Aldrich

Pfizer-Pratt University Professor of Political Science, Duke University

E.J. Dionne, Jr.

Senior Fellow, Governance Studies

Moderators

Larry Bartels

Director, Center for the Study of Democratic Politics, Donald E. Stokes Professor of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University

Thomas E. Mann

Senior Fellow, Governance Studies


My Portfolio

My New Content

View suggested content based on items you have saved to your Portfolio.
Log in or register now