Quality. Independence. Impact.

Home | Contact Us | Media Resources

Thursday January 8, 2009

Welcome   |   Register   |   Log in

Past Event

A Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies Event

Normalizing Japan: Politics, Identity and the Evolution of Security Practice

Japan, Defense, International Relations


Event Summary

Normalizing Japan seeks to answer the question of what future direction Japan's military policies are likely to take by considering how policy has evolved since World War II, and what factors shaped this evolution.

Event Information

When

Wednesday, September 10, 2008
12:15 PM to 1:45 PM

Where

The Brookings Institution
1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Washington, DC
Map

Event Materials

Contact: Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies

E-mail: CNAPS@brookings.edu

Phone: 202.797.6055

Andrew Oros argues that Japanese security policy has not changed as much in recent years as many believe, and that future change also will be highly constrained by Japan's long-standing "security identity," the central principle guiding Japanese policy over the past half century. His analysis is based on detailed exploration of three cases of policy evolution—restrictions on arms exports, the military use of outer space, and cooperation with the United States on missile defense—which shed light on other cases of policy change, such as Japan's deployment of its military to Iraq and elsewhere and its recent creation of a Ministry of Defense. More broadly, the book refines for a wider audience how "ideational" factors interact with domestic politics and international changes to create policy change. The book is the latest in the Stanford University Press Series on Asian Security. For more information, please click here.

Transcript

ANDREW OROS: I’d like to begin the brief overview of my book by saying something about the title. As long as I’ve studied Japan which, believe it or not, is now nearing 25 years, I’ve heard about unique Japan is. In the 1980s, the famous so-called “revisionist,” Karel van Wolferen, even wrote that Japan was uniquely unique, in The Enigma of Japanese Power.

Certainly, cultures vary, and this is important, but I’m interested very much in the politics of security. Here, one of my main goals in this book is to normalize Japan for a non-Japan audience, to say in effect that Japan’s security politics are readily understandable and, largely, even predictable and that, in most ways, they’re similar to security politics in other democracies. Japan is not nearly the outlier that it’s often thought to be in the security realm. Of course, there’s a double entendre in the title. That makes it kind of sexy, right?

There are some in Washington and in Tokyo who think that to normalize Japan means to fundamentally change its approach to security, and I’m not of that school of thought. In my view, a majority of Japanese view their security politics as quite normal and are quite resistant to a dramatic change in security policy. After all, isn’t there something to envy in a country that hasn’t lost a soldier in battle for over 60 years?

Participants

Introduction and Moderator

Richard C. Bush III

Director, Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies

Featured Speaker

Andrew L. Oros

Associate Professor of Political Science and International Studies, Washington College


My Portfolio

My New Content

View suggested content based on items you have saved to your Portfolio.
Log in or register now