Quality. Independence. Impact.

Home | Contact Us | Media Resources

Friday November 27, 2009

Welcome   |   Register   |   Log in

Past Event

A Foreign Policy Event

The U.S.-India Nuclear Agreement

India , Nonproliferation, Nuclear Weapons, Foreign Policy, Energy Security


Event Summary

The controversial 2005 civilian nuclear agreement between the United States and India is widely seen as the lynchpin of the relationship between the world’s two largest democracies. The agreement gives India access to U.S. and international nuclear fuel, equipment and technology to generate energy for India’s booming economy. In exchange, India must separate its military and civilian nuclear facilities, placing the latter under international safeguards. While the agreement addressed certain critical proliferation issues, it has been widely criticized within India and the United States for its internal and regional implications.

Event Information

When

Wednesday, July 30, 2008
2:00 PM to 3:00 PM

Where

Falk Auditorium
The Brookings Institution
1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Washington, DC
Map

Event Materials

Contact: Brookings Office of Communications

E-mail: events@brookings.edu

Phone: 202.797.6105

On July 30, the Brookings Institution hosted a panel discussion on the future and implications of the India-U.S. nuclear agreement. The panel featured Brookings President Strobe Talbott, who as deputy secretary of state led negotiations with India following its 1998 nuclear tests; former Under Secretary of State Nicholas Burns, who was the United States lead negotiator on the nuclear agreement; and Robert Einhorn, senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Brookings Senior Fellow Stephen P. Cohen provided introductory remarks and comments.

Transcript

NICK BURNS: We’ve had diplomatic relations with India for 60 years, since Partition. For more than half of that the elephant in the room has been the prospect that India has felt it was not treated equitably by our country and others. And I think there is very good reason for President Bush to believe the time had come to remove that elephant from the room.

I would say, but I would defer to others here who are more expert on the nonproliferation regime and both Strobe and Bob have a lot of expertise in that, but my conviction has always been, this deal strengthens the international nonproliferation regime because it resolves this fundamental contradiction inherent in the regime. There are countries inside, like Iran, cheating. And countries outside playing by the rules of the club, but not allowed to join the club and India is the foremost example of that. It will make India a stakeholder in the international nonproliferation regime as the soon-to-be largest country in the world.

Furthermore, I think it answers this fundamental practical question that President Bush and Secretary Rice were grappling with at the beginning of their second term in office. Are we better off continuing to implement an ineffective and ultimately self-defeating proliferation regime against India or bringing India in?

Participants

Introduction and Comments

Stephen P. Cohen

Senior Fellow, Foreign Policy

Featured Speakers

Strobe Talbott

President, The Brookings Institution

R. Nicholas Burns

Former Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs

Robert Einhorn

Senior Adviser, Center for Strategic and International Studies


My Portfolio

My New Content

View suggested content based on items you have saved to your Portfolio.
Log in or register now