Quality. Independence. Impact.

Home | Contact Us | Media Resources

Saturday October 11, 2008

Welcome   |   Register   |   Log in

Past Event

A Foreign Policy Event

The Kashmir Dispute: Making Borders Irrelevant

India, Pakistan

Event Summary

For decades, the Kashmir conflict has been viewed as intractable, but recent developments now offer the prospect of a new era. Pakistani and Indian governments have undertaken new approaches to managing the region once called the "most dangerous place in the world" and have adopted the mantra of "making borders irrelevant." As a result, the Pakistanis and Indians have increased interaction across the Line of Control which separates the two sides, including on issues such as trade. What does this slogan mean in practice and how committed are the various parties to change?

Event Information

When

Wednesday, June 04, 2008
10:00 AM to 11:30 AM

Where

Saul/Zilkha Rooms
The Brookings Institution
1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Washington, DC
Map

Event Materials

Contact: Brookings Office of Communications

E-mail: events@brookings.edu

Phone: 202.797.6105

On June 4, the Brookings Institution and the United States Institute of Peace hosted scholars P.R. Chari and Hasan Askari Rizvi in a discussion about their upcoming study “Making Borders Irrelevant in Kashmir.” The study examines the opportunities and obstacles for increasing trade and movement across the Line of Control, the constituencies that would favor or oppose this approach, and the steps necessary to move the process forward. Brookings Senior Fellow Stephen P. Cohen provided introductory remarks and comments.

After the program, the speakers took audience questions.

Transcript

DR. RIZVI:  Two people conducted these surveys, and the interesting point about the two surveys is that the two gentlemen were not in communication with each other; however, there are several findings more or less went in the same direction. That is there was general support for the idea of making the Line of Control irrelevant, the idea of encouraging interaction across the Line of Control, there was support found in the two surveys.

However, there was also a lot of skepticism, there was also doubt. This skepticism was will the two governments really do that? Is it going to be true or it is yet another propaganda effort by the two governments and not address the question, and then different people approach the notion from the perspective of their point of view or their interest, and I’ll come to that subsequently. And on the Pakistani side, we also examined what are the problems or what are the steps you have to undertake before you can travel on the buses that go from the Pakistani side of Kashmir to the Indian side, and I will talk about those problems later on, and the notion of making borders irrelevant in Kashmir has been examined in the historical and contemporary context, and you will find a lot of material in the report regarding the classical position of the two governments, how does a position change?

But the report is not a kind of paper that talks about the whole issue in unrealistic manner. There is a full and complete recognition of the issues and problems that are involved; that is the difficulties that are likely to come in the way have been fully identified so that it becomes a kind of realistic and down-to-earth analysis of the new trends-data emerging in Kashmir.

Participants

Introduction and Comments

Stephen P. Cohen

Senior Fellow, Foreign Policy

Featured Speakers

P. R. Chari

Research Professor, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies

Hasan Askari Rizvi

Pakistan Studies Scholar, Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies

My Portfolio

My New Content

View suggested content based on items you have saved to your Portfolio.
Log in or register now