Quality. Independence. Impact.

Home | Contact Us | Media Resources

Sunday July 6, 2008

Welcome   |   Register   |   Log in

Past Event

A Governance Studies and Red and Blue Nation Event

Red and Blue Nation?  Consequences and Correction of America’s Polarized Politics

U.S. Politics, Politics

Event Summary

"Polarization" is often identified as the cause behind government stalemates and ineffectiveness. But, what do we really know about the consequences of polarization? And is there anything that can be done to mitigate America’s political divisions? The Brookings Institution and the Hoover Institution investigated these questions in a three-year study, culminating in two volumes entitled Red and Blue Nation?, edited by Pietro S. Nivola of Brookings and David W. Brady of Stanford University.

Event Information

When

Friday, February 15, 2008
10:00 AM to 12:00 PM

Where

Falk Auditorium
The Brookings Institution
1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Washington, DC
Directions

Event Materials

Contact: Brookings Office of Communications

E-mail: events@brookings.edu

Phone: 202.797.6105

On February 15, Brookings released the second and final volume, which specifically addresses the consequences of polarized politics and possible corrective policies. Nivola, vice president and director of Governance Studies at Brookings, and Brady were joined by contributing volume authors William Galston, a senior fellow at Brookings, and Peter Beinart, of the Council on Foreign Relations, in a discussion of their findings.

Transcript

PIETRO NIVOLA:  So, this is my first point. Our polarization, it exists, it’s real, but it is pretty mild by historical standards and in comparison with various other countries.

Now, here’s another point I want to make. Partisanship actually gets a pretty bad rap, and it’s silly to give it a bad rap. I have a lot of respect for, for example, former Senator Bob Graham of Florida, but he wrote in the Post recently an article in which he spoke about the need to “cut out the cancer of partisanship.” Well, partisanship is not a cancer, I don’t think. Parties are essential to a viable democracy. Without them, you cannot organize politics. You can’t -- a democracy does not function without partisanship.  And the more distinct the parties are, in some ways, the better. When there was not "a dime’s worth of difference”, as we used to say between Democrat and Republican candidates, it actually had a negative effect on political participation. Voters got bored by two parties that were too much alike. With the parties more polarized, they been energized, they’re engaged, and they’re turning out in much bigger numbers.

Participants

Introduction and Moderator

Pietro S. Nivola

Senior Fellow, Governance Studies

Panelists

David W. Brady

Deputy Director and Senior Fellow, The Hoover Institution, Stanford University

Peter Beinart

Senior Fellow, The Council on Foreign Relations

William A. Galston

Senior Fellow, Governance Studies

My Portfolio

My New Content

View suggested content based on items you have saved to your Portfolio.
Log in or register now