Sunday February 12, 2012

Welcome   |   Register   |   Log in

Past Event

A Governance Studies and Brown Center on Education Policy Event

Lessons Learned: What International Assessments Tell Us about Math Achievement

Education

Event Summary

For more than four decades, international assessments conducted by the International Association for Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) have measured how well students are learning mathematics around the world. In Lessons Learned: What International Assessments Tell Us about Math Achievement (Brookings Press, 2007), the authors utilize the wealth of data collected from these assessments to address several pressing questions about school policy and educational research. How do US math curriculums compare to those used overseas? Is the effect of technology in the classroom uniform across nations? How do popular math reforms fare abroad?

Event Information

When

Wednesday, January 23, 2008
1:00 PM to 2:30 PM

Where

Falk Auditorium
The Brookings Institution
1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Washington, DC
Map

Contact: Brookings Office of Communications

Email: events@brookings.edu

Phone: 202.797.6105

On January 23, Tom Loveless, the book’s editor and director of the Brown Center on Education Policy at Brookings, hosted a discussion with the authors. Panelists included Ina V.S. Mullis and Michael O. Martin of Boston College and authors of “TIMSS in Perspective: Lessons Learned from IEA’s Four Decades of International Mathematics Assessments”; Jeremy Kilpatrick of the University of Georgia and co-author of “U.S. Algebra Performance in an International Contest”; and William Schmidt of Michigan State University and co-author of “Lack of Focus in the Mathematics Curriculum: Symptom or Cause?”. Francis "Skip" Fennell, president of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, commented on the chapters.

Listen to the full event >> (mp3)
 

Transcript

WILLIAM SCHMIDT: I want to start out with a simple premise, and that is in today's highly technologically oriented economy which is highly competitive, we have been told it is the flat earth; that in such an environment nations no longer can simply develop their own policies and standards with respect to hardly anything. Take the manufacturing and service sectors. No longer can the United States just decide how it is going to build a car. They can, and they will not sell and we have been there for quite some time. But the standards are now set internationally for any of the products or services and those judgments of quality then are made against those international standards and not the national standards.

I would argue that the same thing is true in terms of education. In this kind of world it would be folly for us to simply ignore what other countries do and the standards for what is a good solid education that prepares people to work in that kind of an environment is now being pretty much set internationally. So these kinds of studies that they have summarized, and especially the IEA ones, really are tied very closely to educational policy and give us a window into what other countries do with respect to those kinds of policies.

Participants

Introduction

Tom Loveless

Senior Fellow, Governance Studies

Panelists

Michael O. Martin

Research Professor, Boston College

Jeremy Kilpatrick

Regents Professor of Mathematics Educations, University of Georgia

Ina V.S. Mullis

Professor, Boston College

William Schmidt

Professor, Michigan State University

Discussant

Francis “Skip” Fennell

President, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics


My Portfolio

My New Content

View suggested content based on items you have saved to your Portfolio.
Log in or register now