Quality. Independence. Impact.

Home | Contact Us | Media Resources

Sunday July 5, 2009

Welcome   |   Register   |   Log in

Past Event

A Governance Studies, Foreign Policy and Red and Blue Nation Event

Partisan Polarization and Foreign Policy

U.S. Congress, Foreign Policy, Politics


Event Summary

Recent polls reveal that Americans are deeply skeptical of U.S. foreign policy and increasingly dissatisfied with the country’s progress in the war in Iraq and in combating terrorism abroad. Meanwhile, bitter partisan battles in Congress persist, as Democrats and Republicans divide over America’s role in the world, curtailing any coherent foreign policy consensus.

Event Information

When

Friday, November 30, 2007
10:00 AM to 11:30 AM

Where

Saul/Zilkha Rooms
The Brookings Institution
1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Washington, DC
Map

Contact: Brookings Office of Communications

E-mail: events@brookings.edu

Phone: 202.797.6105

On November 30, the Brookings Institution hosted a discussion on partisan polarization in the United States and its effect on foreign policy, a topic addressed by Peter Beinart of the Council on Foreign Relations in the forthcoming Brookings book Red and Blue Nation: Volume II. Brookings’s Pietro S. Nivola moderated a discussion with Beinart, Peter Rodman of Brookings, and Michael Hirsh of Newsweek.

Red and Blue Nation, a joint project between Brookings and the Hoover Institution, explores the extent of political polarization in the United States and its potential causes, consequences and corrections.

After the program, panelists took audience questions.

Red and Blue Nation? Volume II
David W. Brady and Pietro S. Nivola, eds.,

Transcript

PETER BEINART:  So, what is the right way to describe the fundamental cleavage between Democrats and Republicans on foreign policy today? The way I would describe it would be this way. I think Democrats believe in collective security and Republicans believe in the balance of power.

What do I mean by that? I think liberal Democrats are the children of Woodrow Wilson.  Woodrow Wilson was not simply about promoting democracy around the world. Woodrow Wilson’s fundamental idea was collective security, the idea that after the destruction of World War I, you would create a global international institution, the league of nations in which all nations would band together and if any one nation violated the peace, they would all join together against them. The model of collective security is all for one and one for all. We’re all in it together. That vision has been re-ignited very powerfully amongst Democrats since the end of the Cold War in a globalized age in which Democrats believe that there are a whole series of threats that threaten all nations and make us all in it together, be they global warming, public health, the spread of nuclear technology, the non-state terrorist. 

Republicans, I think are the children of Henry Cabot Lodge. Henry Cabot Lodge has been defamed by history. He was not an isolationist. He simply didn’t want a universal institution like the league of nations. He wanted an alliance with France against Germany. His motto was us versus them. He didn’t believe that you could have universal cooperation between all nations.  He wanted a balance of power between America and its allies against the countries that threaten us, a balance of power, I think we tend to think of wrongly in terms of an equilibrium, scales, you know, that people who want a balance of power want an equality of power between us and our foes. That’s usually not the case.  What you want is a dis-equilibrium. That’s what Henry Cabot Lodge wanted. That’s what Dick Cheney wants. The right metaphor is not scales but a bank balance. You want a favorable balance of power. That’s what Henry Cabot Lodge wanted against Germany. That’s, I think, the natural way that conservatives tend to think about foreign policy, creating positive favorable balance of power against the nations that threaten us.

Participants

Introduction and Moderator

Pietro S. Nivola

Senior Fellow, Governance Studies

Featured Speakers

Peter Beinart

Senior Fellow for U.S. Foreign Policy, Council on Foreign Relations

Michael Hirsh

Senior Editor, Newsweek Washington Bureau

Peter W. Rodman

Senior Fellow, Foreign Policy


My Portfolio

My New Content

View suggested content based on items you have saved to your Portfolio.
Log in or register now