Quality. Independence. Impact.

Home | Contact Us | Media Resources

Thursday January 8, 2009

Welcome   |   Register   |   Log in

Past Event

CNAPS Visiting Fellow Presentation

Denuclearizing North Korea: The Imminent Challenges of Economic and Energy Assistance

North Korea, Nuclear Weapons, Economic Development, Energy Security, Northeast Asia


Event Summary

The six-party talks on the North Korean nuclear problem are entering a very delicate stage. Modalities of actual disablement and dismantlement are to be agreed upon and implemented, and for the United States security issues are at the forefront. But the North Koreans’ attention is now focused on the provision of energy security as a prerequisite for closing down the existing nuclear program. At this CNAPS Presentation, Professor Georgy Toloraya discussed the options of economic assistance to North Korea, which is to be provided in a manner that would increase security and promote the country’s economic “conventionalization.” He argued that the energy sphere is a priority area which could set the pattern of future economic changes in DPRK and calls for a coordinated response to this challenge from the members of the six-party talks.

Event Information

When

Friday, October 12, 2007
10:30 AM to 12:00 PM

Where

Zilkha Room
The Brookings Institution
1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Washington, DC
Map

Contact: Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies

E-mail: cnaps@brookings.edu

Phone: 202.797.6055

Professor Georgy Toloraya, a CNAPS Visiting Fellow at Bookings, is a diplomat who has served most recently as the Russian Federation’s Consul General in Sydney, Australia. Previous positions include Deputy Director-General at the First Asian Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Deputy Chief of Mission at the Russian Embassy in the Republic of Korea; and economic officer in the Soviet embassy in Pyongyang. In addition to his successful diplomatic career, Dr. Toloraya has published many scholarly articles and books and is the founder and research director of Center of Contemporary Korean Studies, IMEMO. He received his M.A. at Moscow Institute of International Relations, Ph.D. in Economics at the Graduate School of the Institute of Economics of the World Socialist System, and Doctor of Economy degree at the Academy of Science of the Russian Federation.

Transcript

Georgy Toloraya: I think that the next step under the Six-Party process is to suggest to North Korea to sit together and work out some kind of a long-term economic plan and how we are going to modernize their economy. And while I insist that reforms and openness are not the right words, we should speak about modernization and maybe normalization of their economy. The Six-Party mechanism could be a sort of coordinator in this process, so even after the working groups on normalizing bilateral relations with the U.S. and North Korea and Japan are long gone, I think the economic working group should evolve into a body which oversees the economic assistance programs and how they are implemented. They could also be joined by other countries which are interested in North Korea’s economy like the European Union and Australia or Canada or whoever. It should work in coordination with the international financial organizations like the IMF, the World Bank, Asian Development Bank as well as others, and they should be very consistent. The economic aid, the economic assistance, and the investments should be funneled into the areas which help transform the North Korean economic structure and help the country to modernize.

Then we come to the question: Is it possible from the point of view of the economic system? Is the marketization of North Korea possible? It is well underway regardless of what the North Koreans say and write. It is going on and I think that we should promote these kinds of tendencies by encouraging economic experiments, such as the way to a market economy in China: creating isolated experimental farms while working on more or less market principles, arranging the facilities for export production, joint ventures, and free economic zones which already exist. We have remarkable and spectacular progress with that because of the recent Korean summit meeting when North and South Korea actually agreed that the whole triangle adjacent to the military demarcation line would become a sort of hunting ground for South Korean business. But these experiments should not be seen by the North Korean leadership as challenging the core of the economy, the core of their political system and gradually accepted and broadened around the country. Sooner or later these quantitative changes will lead to quality changes.

Participants

Speaker


My Portfolio

My New Content

View suggested content based on items you have saved to your Portfolio.
Log in or register now