Quality. Independence. Impact.

Home | Contact Us | Media Resources

Monday November 9, 2009

Welcome   |   Register   |   Log in

Past Event

A Foreign Policy and Saban Center for Middle East Policy Event

Saban Center Expert Comments on Iraqi Constitution

Iraq, Middle East, Global Governance, Islamic World


Event Summary

Ken Pollack of the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at The Brookings Institution held a media conference call at 12:00 noon (EST) on Tuesday, August 16 to comment on progress toward drafting the Iraqi constitution. The self-imposed deadline for Iraq to draft a proposed constitution is Aug. 15

Event Information

When

Tuesday, August 16, 2005
12:00 PM to

Where

Falk Auditorium
The Brookings Institution
1775 Massachusetts Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Map

Event Materials

Contact: Brookings Office of Communications

E-mail: events@brookings.edu

Phone: 202.797.6105

Writing in The New York Times on July 1, 2005, Pollack laid out five key lessons of previous counter insurgency campaigns for the United States campaign in Iraq. Pollack argued for: putting a higher priority on protecting Iraqis as they go about their daily lives; providing enough manpower for the job; allowing time for the Iraqi Security Forces to learn; decentralizing the reconstruction effort away from politicians in Baghdad; and buying off Sunni sheiks.

The director of Research at the Saban Center, Kenneth Pollack, has served as Director for Persian Gulf Affairs at the National Security Council. Pollack is the author of three acclaimed books, The Persian Puzzle: The Conflict Between Iran and America (Random House, 2004); The Threatening Storm: The Case for Invading Iraq (Random House, 2002); Arabs at War: Military Effectiveness, 1948-1991 (University of Nebraska Press, 2002). Pollack is also an expert on Iran and can comment on the current crisis around the Iranian nuclear program.

Transcript

Ken Pollack: Obviously, the big news is the delay in the constitution, and I'll start by saying I don't think the delay is at all a bad thing. My feeling has always been that no matter how you look at the political future of Iraq, no matter what your theory for how things could, should work out in Iraq; having a good constitution is far more important than having an immediate constitution.

If you start with the administration's theory - and I don't subscribe to the administration's theory, but I think it's worth laying it out there. If the administration's theory about how things are going to get better in Iraq is that we're going to have a constitution that all Iraqis will look at and like and want to participate in.

That will lead to good elections where huge numbers of Iraqis will participate which will then create a legitimate government that virtually all Iraqis will wish to support and that that support will be what destroys the insurgency and creates kind of, you know, an Iraqi ground swell for dealing with the other problems that are out there.

Read the full transcript (PDF—47kb)


My Portfolio

My New Content

View suggested content based on items you have saved to your Portfolio.
Log in or register now