Quality. Independence. Impact.

Home | Contact Us | Media Resources

Monday November 9, 2009

Welcome   |   Register   |   Log in

Past Event

Brookings Institution/Princeton University Briefing

Voter Mobilization and Turnout

U.S. Politics, Elections, Politics


Event Summary

With the controversy over the 2000 presidential election still fresh in the national memory, and with polls continuing to project a very close race on November 2, the issue of voter turnout has been at the forefront of discussions about what sways election results. Questions that frame analyses of turnout include:

Event Information

When

Friday, October 29, 2004
10:00 AM to 11:30 AM

Where

Falk Auditorium
The Brookings Institution
1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Washington, DC
Map

Contact: Brookings Office of Communications

E-mail: communications@brookings.edu

Phone: 202.797.6105

  • Why is turnout lower in the United States than in other advanced democracies?


  • How have turnout rates been changing for the electorate as a whole and for specific social groups? What are the implications of those trends for the two major political parties?


  • What are partisan and nonpartisan groups doing to stimulate higher turnout, and how effective will those efforts be?

On the Friday before the election, the Governance Studies program at the Brookings Institution and the Center for the Study of Democratic Politics at Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs will hold a panel discussion on voter turnout with political scientists from around the country and Wall Street Journal reporter Jeanne Cummings. The event is the fourth in a series of roundtable discussions on the election sponsored by Brookings and Princeton.

Transcript

MICHAEL McDONALD: And Larry very well described what's going on with the overall trends in turnout, but I wanted to just point out—because some people may have, this may be the first time that they've seen this information—why it's so important to contrast using the voting age population, which is the denominator that many people have used up until 2000 as the correct way of calculating turnout rates versus using something like the eligible population.

If you look at Figure 1 on that handout, you'll see that from 1972 through 2000 presidential elections using the voting eligible population or the voting age population as the denominator. What is the voting age population? If you go to the Census Bureau, it's something that the Census Bureau used to regularly report prior to an election so that we could get estimates of turnout, not just nationally, but in the States, and use this information.

They would produce a sex, age, race distribution so that pollsters could weight their surveys properly. And their documentation is very explicit. It says that this is everybody age 18 and older living inside the United States. And it excludes people like overseas citizens, and it includes people who aren't eligible to vote. The definition was sitting there for everybody to look at, but nobody really bothered to say, well, what might be the consequence of looking at those eligible versus those who are just age 18 and older.

Well, it turns out, since 1972, we have seen a flood of noncitizens come into the United States, and the calculation then of voting age population gradually became skewed as to a perception of what's going on in terms of turnout. And in 1972, we were looking at about 1.5 percent of the voting age population was not a citizen. By today, we're looking at almost 8 percent of the voting age population. And that 8 percent is not evenly distributed throughout the United States. It should come as no big surprise that most of it's located in California and other large metropolitan areas, other states. And if you look at California, for example, nearly 20 percent of its voting age population is ineligible to vote either because of the noncitizen question or the other trend that we've seen upwards from the 1980s, which is the number of ineligible felons, according to state law. Not all states have the same laws.

Read the complete event transcript (PDF—117KB)

Participants

Moderated by

Thomas E. Mann

Senior Fellow, Governance Studies

Panel

Alan Gerber

Professor of Political Science, Yale University

Jeanne Cummings

National Political Reporter, Wall Street Journal

Larry M. Bartels

Donald E. Stokes Professor of Public and International Affairs, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University

Lynn Vavreck

Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of California, Los Angeles

Michael P. McDonald

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Governance Studies


My Portfolio

My New Content

View suggested content based on items you have saved to your Portfolio.
Log in or register now