Quality. Independence. Impact.

Home | Contact Us | Media Resources

Friday November 27, 2009

Welcome   |   Register   |   Log in

Past Event

Brookings Institution/Princeton University Briefing

The 2004 Presidential Election: How Much Do Campaigns Matter?

U.S. Politics, Politics, Elections


Event Summary

How do the elements of the political campaign that candidates consider crucial—television commercials, debates, print and broadcast news coverage—affect elections? Do they energize and inform prospective voters, or distract and alienate them? How are campaign activities shaped by electoral laws and institutions, such as those governing campaign finance?

Event Information

When

Friday, October 01, 2004
10:00 AM to 11:30 AM

Where

Falk Auditorium
Brookings Institution
1775 Massachusetts Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20036
Map

Event Materials

Contact: Office of Communications

E-mail: communications@brookings.edu

Phone: 202.797.6105

On the day after the first presidential debate, a panel of experts convened by the Governance Studies Program at the Brookings Institution and the Center for the Study of Democratic Politics at Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs will examine how—and how much—various campaign activities influence the final results. The event is the second in a series of roundtable discussions this fall being sponsored by Brookings and Princeton.

Transcript

LARRY BARTELS: What I want to do to start is just to say a little bit generally about how political scientists think about campaign events and their effects, which is rather different, I think, that the way most people tend to think about them. I think most people's views about campaigns and how they work is in significant part the product of a kind of self-interested conspiracy between journalists who want you to believe that it's important to get up every morning and read what Rick Berke writes about what happened yesterday because it's somehow fundamental to how the election is going to turn out, and campaign consultants who have an even more obvious professional self-interest in convincing the world that what they do is important and indeed often decisive.

Well, it can be decisive, as we found out in 2000. When the election is close, even things that have small effects can hugely important. That is obviously true, but what I want to talk about a little bit is how we should think about those effects and their likely magnitudes.

Read the complete event transcript (PDF—120KB)

Participants

Moderators

Thomas E. Mann

Senior Fellow, Governance Studies

Panelists

Anthony Corrado

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Governance Studies

Daron Shaw

Associate Professor of Government, University of Texas at Austin

Kenneth Goldstein

Professor of Political Science and Director, UW Advertising Project, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Larry M. Bartels

Donald E. Stokes Professor of Public and International Affairs, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University

Richard Berke

Washington Editor, The New York Times


My Portfolio

My New Content

View suggested content based on items you have saved to your Portfolio.
Log in or register now